Settle this Poker Theory / Sklansky bucks debate

[kamana]

NL 100: <font color="red"> Player A</font> gets K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 10x in a row, while <font color="blue"> player B</font> gets A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 10x in a row. They go all in every hand and <font color="red">player A</font> (KK) <u>wins them all</u>. There is no rake. Player A is +$1000.

They agree to go to NL 1,000: <font color="red">Player A</font> gets A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and <font color="blue">player B</font> gets K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. They go all in and <font color="blue">Player B wins</font>. Now they have the same amount of money from when they started.

What is the EV of player A ?
EV of player B ?
Is he running good , bad , or neutral ? <font color="red"> </font>