|
|
|
|
#1
11-24-2007, 11:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] if he can read hands at all hes not folding K high here [/ QUOTE ] lol if thats the case you dont c/r the river nearly often enough [/ QUOTE ] fees- against a thinking opponent this is a rly sick line with KQ QJ for sure 
|
|
#2
11-24-2007, 12:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
Everyone make sure you read my post about where this came from. Also sauce I've been thinking the same thing, c/ring river with middle pair type hands for value agaisnt better opponents. Going to experiment with it next week.
|
|
#3
11-24-2007, 07:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] if he can read hands at all hes not folding K high here [/ QUOTE ] lol if thats the case you dont c/r the river nearly often enough [/ QUOTE ] fees- against a thinking opponent this is a rly sick line with KQ QJ for sure [/ QUOTE ] I don't get it exactly, why is this a good line to take with KQ, QJ? What worse hands do you guys expect to call you with? I imagine the river c/r is for value right? Btw except durr, how often is a thinking player limping the botton?
|
|
#5
11-24-2007, 11:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] if he can read hands at all hes not folding K high here [/ QUOTE ] lol if thats the case you dont c/r the river nearly often enough [/ QUOTE ] fees- against a thinking opponent this is a rly sick line with KQ QJ for sure [/ QUOTE ] no, it would be terrible.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
