Jam or fold tables in "The Mathematics of Poker"

[the emmitt]

Apologies if this has been covered in the main thread but there are almost 400 posts in the topic and a search didn't reveal anything.

Would I be right in thinking, assuming their original hypotheses are correct:

1) That if I was to halve the numbers in the "attack" table it would give me the correct figures to jam from the button (assuming all fold to me)
2) That if I was to halve the numbers in the "defend" table it would give me the correct figures to call a jam from the blind?

Any thoughts welcomed.

[binions]

[ QUOTE ]
Apologies if this has been covered in the main thread but there are almost 400 posts in the topic and a search didn't reveal anything.

Would I be right in thinking, assuming their original hypotheses are correct:

1) That if I was to halve the numbers in the "attack" table it would give me the correct figures to jam from the button (assuming all fold to me)
2) That if I was to halve the numbers in the "defend" table it would give me the correct figures to call a jam from the blind?

Any thoughts welcomed.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jam table is for SB. Defend table is for BB. In a 2 man game (where SB is button). A full ring game folded to the SB is similar but not identical b/c card removal effects.

[CasinoR7]

What does jam mean?

[binions]

[ QUOTE ]
What does jam mean?

[/ QUOTE ]

Stuff you spread on toast.

[CasinoR7]

No seriously? Not that kind of jam.

[bozzer]

shove

[CasinoR7]

thanks

[the emmitt]

ok, so to clarify the table only really has application for heads-up cash (or the final stage of a tournament), rather than as a guide for blind stealing/defense when the table has >2 players?