#1
|
|||
|
|||
So What\'s The Ruling?
Situation over the weekend that I was suprised at the ruling of.
1/2 NL UTG+1 raises to $11 gets four callers. $57 pot on the flop of A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]10 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG+1 bets $50 CO & Button call. Turn is the A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. UTG+1 goes all in for his last $60 or so. CO folds, button calls and has him covered. River is 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. UTG+1 tables J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. Button is at the other end of the table from me and turns over a red Ace and a baby. Dealer pushes the pot to the button. Button starts stacking the chips. Cards are mucked. Guy in the two seat starts talking about how it would have been a BBJ if the other guy had Aces instead of a full house. Then the CO says he didn't have a full house he had A4. So now the UTG+1 of course says "Well I had a full house. Why is that his pot?" Dealer gets confused look on his face. Floor is called. What is the ruling? |
|
|