anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment

[Smart Money]

[ QUOTE ]
yeah, but its become the accepted way of denoting winrate. Switching it into bb seems like senseless inflation of numbers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, if we Brits can make the change from Imperial to Metric....

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[novel20]

"How ya doing this month?"
"Meh... just 2 pibb/100 for 50k hands."

[GiantBuddha]

[ QUOTE ]
"How ya doing this month?"
"Meh... just 2 pibb/100 for 50k hands."

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take a 2pibb/100 winrate.

[Smart Money]

So, it's agreed. piBB/100 is the new standard.

[the_main]

[ QUOTE ]


It's BB/100 (senseless using ptBB when referring to NL- other than it's the PT default.)



[/ QUOTE ]

I've been saying this forever but no one listens to me.

[Smart Money]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


It's BB/100 (senseless using ptBB when referring to NL- other than it's the PT default.)



[/ QUOTE ]

I've been saying this forever but no one listens to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here you go:

http://www.befrienders.org/

[jphil007]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


From memory, very few (if any) of the most profitable players have such a high PFR% (at least at $1/$2- I'm not so familiar with $2/$4.)

(Also, most of the players that do have a high PFR% are losing players.)



[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry but I totally disagree with this.

[/ QUOTE ]


These are the Top 20 earners from the last 800k hands that I've played.



[/ QUOTE ]

At NL200 and lower, a PFR under 10% is a good way to play.

At NL400 and higher limits in full ring, I Think that a PFR over 10% is EV+.

[jphil007]

[ QUOTE ]
you guys are all absolutely wrong.

the problem comes from his play in UTG and UTG+1. have a clue.

and to the guy with that sample of a million nits, it tells me A)I should play FTP, and B) You probably have those results because the nits have to play more hands due to their [censored] winrates. And is that the standard PTBB? or the one that's just BB/100 cause I know you can change the option in PT and running at 6ptbb playing 20/5 over 800k hands seems blasphemous.

In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah his stats are NOT in ptBB/100, they are in big blinds/100.

[bottomset]

[ QUOTE ]
At NL200 and lower, a PFR under 10% is a good way to play.


[/ QUOTE ]

you can do well, but its leaving a lot of money on the table

[Smart Money]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At NL200 and lower, a PFR under 10% is a good way to play.


[/ QUOTE ]

you can do well, but its leaving a lot of money on the table

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you base that opinion on?