donkeytest

[NT=TOOLBOX]

[ QUOTE ]
keep making those excuses ya low stakes winner [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no doubt that you are higher caliber player than 200nl winner, but i was just saying maybe high stakes pro in this day and age might be a little off [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. Sad thing is the test is right about me, i dont have a winning record at any stake above 200nl [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] (besides heads up play, i made like 3k on full tilt playing 400nl but cashed out after they denied me for rakeback even after i told them how much [censored] poker i play)

[AceCR9]

took it while back, got a 137 the first time

[illini43]

117 Yay - wins at 100NL at lower.

[coordi]

Your PokerIQ is: 126

Time to move up baby!

[pokerscaresme]

I scored a 91.. it took me a long time though..
probably not a great idea to take a timed test while 6-tabling

[ship_it_trebek]

Your PokerIQ is: 127

I make terrible donkament decisions

[Vandalar]

107- but i'm not complaining. I think it is quite accurate.

[Kos13]

130...meh.

[Ron Burgundy]

Awesome test!

I scored 108. Apparently I'm not good enough to beat raked games.... oh wait... I've made a living at poker for 3 years.

[ImsaKidd]

The TT question is retarded. Does "big pair" include JJ? 99?



"A tight-aggressive player in middle position raises to $200. You choose to call on the button with TT, and a relatively tight short stack with $1,500 in the big blind pushes all-in. You've only seen him do this with big pairs and AK or AQ so far.

The middle position player thinks and folds. What should you do?"