Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:38 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Capping QQ in a 5bet max structure? not a simple...ALWAYS!

[ QUOTE ]
Personally I feel that's a dumb rule... you should be able to have the cap enforced if the street started with 3 players, but whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Personally, I feel this is a stupid complaint. It's a highly theoretical situation that comes up less than once every 100000 hands. But whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-29-2007, 06:03 PM
B2_eBoogaloo B2_eBoogaloo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: procrastinating 7K
Posts: 187
Default Re: Capping QQ in a 5bet max structure? not a simple...ALWAYS!

[ QUOTE ]
Would you really want the cap in place if you had quads vs nut boat, or straight flush over Ace high flush?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes true, but also I think that is probably neither here nor there. It would be similar to playing a short-stack NL strategy vs big-stack. We could imagine a limit game where there is no cap. This affects how we play. It may change the way we play thinner draws depending on the aggression of our opponents (i.e. the rammer/jammer game).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-29-2007, 06:50 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: looking for the bigger nits
Posts: 7,905
Default Re: Capping QQ in a 5bet max structure? not a simple...ALWAYS!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Would you really want the cap in place if you had quads vs nut boat, or straight flush over Ace high flush?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes true, but also I think that is probably neither here nor there. It would be similar to playing a short-stack NL strategy vs big-stack. We could imagine a limit game where there is no cap. This affects how we play. It may change the way we play thinner draws depending on the aggression of our opponents (i.e. the rammer/jammer game).

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree w/ the bolded part. Any good limit player should want to have as many opportunities to take money from his/her opponent. Having no cap when HU is one of these opportunities. Having a cap when HU does not help a good limit player in any way I can see. 3+ handed, sure, but not HU.

SS v big stack NL is very different. Many, Many good NL players despise SS strategy for several reasons, and there are obviously many good short-stackers that play horrible deep. Short-stacking essentially puts a cap on yourself, but the reasoning is totally different. When short-stacking NL, you are making your decisions far easier because of such a shallow commitment threshold, while greatly reducing your opponents options as well (not to mention their implied odds). This strategy is an attempt to make your play unexploitable. This is why short-stacking NL(correctly) is a very valid option for players new to poker. This logic only goes that direction though because you can not say/assume that because a player is short-stacking, they must be horrible at poker... just look at Curtains.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.