Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #301  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:01 PM
BiggieFats BiggieFats is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 48
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

I gotta find my post back in July where I said I'd be shocked if ESPN used more than a minute of the interview Jerry had with with Chad.
Reply With Quote
  #302  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:02 PM
post1958 post1958 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 41
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Don't you have to bet out on the flop if your Rahme there? You know, find out where you are and all.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I'd say that's the right move. However, I don't hate this play. Yang could very easily be betting something other than an ace there. Even if he does have an ace, the heat of an all in might get him to fold, and it almost did.

So, as far as this being a standard donktacular Rahme play...meh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Although we've seen Yang call with Ax during the FT as a rule.

[/ QUOTE ]

And that's before he flopped a pair of aces - no way he folds.
Reply With Quote
  #303  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:03 PM
aceskay aceskay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 409
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

[ QUOTE ]
I gotta find my post back in July where I said I'd be shocked if ESPN used more than a minute of the interview Jerry had with with Chad.

[/ QUOTE ]

espn never uses more than 1 minute of anyone's conversation with norman chad
Reply With Quote
  #304  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:05 PM
Mush Memoirs Mush Memoirs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: mushmemoirs.blogspot
Posts: 9
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

The better question is why only 1 hand of HU action...that was ridiculous. What a terrible production.

Reply With Quote
  #305  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:05 PM
I_AM_EVIL I_AM_EVIL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Satan Claus
Posts: 1,763
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

How many hands or how long did Yang and Lam play HU? I watched the live broadcast but can't remember now.
Reply With Quote
  #306  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:07 PM
vixticator vixticator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,639
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

[ QUOTE ]
How many hands or how long did Yang and Lam play HU? I watched the live broadcast but can't remember now.

[/ QUOTE ]I'm trying to remember, I think it was over 20...? Maybe slightly less. Didn't Jerry just raise and Lam fold a bunch?
Reply With Quote
  #307  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:08 PM
cbloom cbloom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: communist
Posts: 8,940
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

Hmmm... when Yang won everyone was saying what a donk he was, but watching this he seems to be playing pretty solid aggro big stack poker. He played better than everyone at the table except Kravchenko. Everyone else was just giving away their chips.
Reply With Quote
  #308  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:08 PM
sweetjazz sweetjazz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 3,700
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

As donktacular as Rahme's play with KK ended up being as the cards lay, it's a pretty tough hand to play given the stack sizes and his preflop raise amount. (But it's hard not to 3bet preflop because he is getting so much value there, if anything he could have raised more preflop.) Even if he leads out on the flop, what does he do when Jerry calls? Jerry could have Jx 8x a draw. What does he do when Jerry pushes (especially given his perception of Jerry's play)? With that flop, his hand has about 50% equity against Jerry's range and the pot is about half the size of his remaining stack, so it's not really an easy hand to play. That said, the check/raise was pretty nasty because his hand is close to the cutoff of Yang's calling versus folding range (except of course Yang calls all draws as well).
Reply With Quote
  #309  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:14 PM
heater heater is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Behind enemy lines
Posts: 2,535
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

The Jesus stuff tilted the [censored] outta me. I couldn't bear to watch anymore after the Watkinson bustout.

Also, Russians look ridiculous in baseball caps.
Reply With Quote
  #310  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:15 PM
sweetjazz sweetjazz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 3,700
Default Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)

[ QUOTE ]
Hmmm... when Yang won everyone was saying what a donk he was, but watching this he seems to be playing pretty solid aggro big stack poker. He played better than everyone at the table except Kravchenko. Everyone else was just giving away their chips.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yang played the JJ early on badly, his call with JT was lol atrocious, his 3bet with AT versus Kravchenko was bad (but not awful), putting Kravchenko all-in with a $20 million bet with 88 was pretty terrible, his preflop call of Rahme's 3bet with A5 was also really bad.

Two of those he got burned for small amounts of his stack, the other he could have been crippled but was fortunate that (1) Childs folded QQ after putting in half his stack, (2) he ran into the only coin flip hand in Kravchenko's calling range, and (3) he flopped his ace without being dominated against Rahme (whose reraise was a clear big pair or big ace).

Yang's a nice guy and played better than some people at the final table. (Hilm's call with KQ on the AT8 flop was really bad, Watkinson's push with A7o was beyond horrific, and Khan's call with 33 versus Kravchenko's short stack all-in were all pretty bad plays from some otherwise decent players.) But while he was certainly aggro and that helped him chip up in some spots that helped him survive his running bad / bad beats in the middle of the final table, he was far from solid.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.