|
|
#321
11-25-2007, 10:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i for one support not reviewing things that are [censored] obvious. [/ QUOTE ] lol in real time that looked nothing close to a legal catch, sorry. His knee BARELY gets in there. [/ QUOTE ] his knee DOESN'T get in there, but both his feet are clearly in and both refs were pretty close and standing right on the line, they had an excellent view. why didn't reid challenge it if it was shady? eagles' booth could easily tell it's not getting overturned and they don't bother. [/ QUOTE ] Dude you can't challenge inside 2 minutes. LDO 
|
|
#322
11-25-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
Reid can't challenge within 2 minutes of the half. Has to be a booth review.
Obviously he was in, but that is exactly the kind of play they need to be reviewing.
|
|
#323
11-25-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not saying it wasn't a TD but its [censored] that wasn't reviewed. [/ QUOTE ] I may be wrong, but I bet the play WAS reviewed. It's just that the booth saw conclusive evidence before the PAT, so there was no need to stop play. Josh W
|
|
#324
11-25-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
clearly a TD, clearly should have been reviewed, [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Aren't reviews supposed to be for plays that aren't clear? 89,817 and count, count, counting
|
|
#325
11-25-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How can they not review that [censored] [censored] what the [censored] is going on here these refs are TERRIBLE [/ QUOTE ] refs don't determine who reviews there. it's a booth thing. [/ QUOTE ] obvious a call from Goodell came to stop the review. Patriots-hate is good for the NFL.
|
|
#326
11-25-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i for one support not reviewing things that are [censored] obvious. [/ QUOTE ] lol in real time that looked nothing close to a legal catch, sorry. His knee BARELY gets in there. [/ QUOTE ] his knee DOESN'T get in there, but both his feet are clearly in and both refs were pretty close and standing right on the line, they had an excellent view. why didn't reid challenge it if it was shady? eagles' booth could easily tell it's not getting overturned and they don't bother. [/ QUOTE ] Ummmm....
|
|
#327
11-25-2007, 10:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How can they not review that [censored] [censored] what the [censored] is going on here these refs are TERRIBLE [/ QUOTE ] The refs are terrible because they made the right call and are confident enough about their call not to need a review? [/ QUOTE ] First, there was a TERRIBLE spot on that welker catch on 3rd down where, after he put the ball past the 1st down when clearly it was not, the refs gave him that spot. Second, Tom Brady is doing head movements and shoulder fakes to draw guys offsides and the refs don't call it. Finally, the catch at the end of the half was clearly a close call that should be reviewed by the booth. Yes, this officiating crew is terrible.
|
|
#328
11-25-2007, 10:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
Are you serious ? With as much on the line as there is, you feel any human could have been 100% sure there ? lol. Dude it was about 2 inches of knee getting turf before the rest hits the white line. Way too close. [/ QUOTE ] the fact that you are still talking about his knee and criticizing the REFS for not reviewing it is pretty lol
|
|
#329
11-25-2007, 10:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] WHAT!? How is there no review? Knee is clearly out of bounds. [/ QUOTE ] mmm I'm going to disagree, but one thing is for SURE, no way those guys in real time could say that with more then 50% certainty. Brutal no review on that alone. [/ QUOTE ] AFAIK its not the refs who call for a review...its the booth upstairs. So they looked at it once or twice quickly, saw that it was clearly in bounds, and didn't call for a review. Reviews are for when its so close that they need to see multiple angles and/or in slow motion, no? 89,816 and counting
|
|
#330
11-25-2007, 10:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Who would have thought it would be fun to cheer for the Eagles. [/ QUOTE ] Haha so true. I dont really care who wins but it would be fun to see the Pats nervous and challenged and pressured a little bit. The Colts game was fun as hell to watch. [/ QUOTE ] It pains me to say it, but I like Brady. That said, IMO, he's been a whiney little bitch this year. I think he needs a little reality check. I'd like to see them lose their perfect season at home to a team that they should murder. [/ QUOTE ] what has he whined about? why does he need a reality check? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not going to get into an argument about it because it's my opinion from what I've seen of him this year. I have seen several times where he's gone apeshit yelling at people... a side of Brady I've never seen until this year. I think the great success so far this year is fueling his ego, something that wasn't there before. A reailty check in a loss would curb that aspect of him, which doesn't suit him at all. [/ QUOTE ] he was yelling at people the last 2 seasons.... during these past few seasons, several people have talked about "seeing a side of brady they've never seen before, yelling at people, etc" explain why or you are full of it.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
