|
|
|
|
#1
11-11-2007, 04:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
I said nowhere that this was violating any terms. I simply said that it is questionably obtaining a huge advantage, possibly crossing (not illegal) moral and ethical standards. Then I wanted to know what everyone else thought about having 3+ people playing vs a mark in a nosebleed HU game (meaning he probably has no clue this practice even takes place and therefore you can't argue "he didn't have to sit") from an ethical/moral standpoint, not a legal one.
|
|
#2
11-11-2007, 04:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
Why is this limited to HU? I know some guys who do this in FR games. Whatever the case, if there is no rule at the site that states one player to a hand, then I really don't see the problem with it. Even if the marks don't know. The marks don't know a lot of things about poker; that's how we make our money.
|
|
#3
11-14-2007, 08:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
Hmmm..3 huge egos arguing and fighting about how to play every hand on every street. Where's the edge?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
