|
|
|
|
#1
10-26-2007, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA facing 4Bet All-in
SABR, what would be a good line here? It seems that hands which might explain BBs line (taking stats into account) probably include 66-JJ, 76, maybe A6/A7.
Stoving it, we crush that range, so it would be an obvious shove. However, I don't know if stoving it makes any sense, as pokerstove doesn't weight the likelihood of various holdings (other than # of combos). I think I like to call here (meaning call the $9, not the $67.50) and try to get to a cheap showdown. Does that make sense, or is it awfully weak tight? 
|
|
#2
10-26-2007, 01:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL50 - AA facing 4Bet All-in
[ QUOTE ]
I think I like to call here (meaning call the $9, not the $67.50) and try to get to a cheap showdown. Does that make sense, or is it awfully weak tight? [/ QUOTE ] I think this is fine against someone with those stats.
|
|
#3
10-26-2007, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL50 - AA facing 4Bet All-in
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think I like to call here (meaning call the $9, not the $67.50) and try to get to a cheap showdown. Does that make sense, or is it awfully weak tight? [/ QUOTE ] I think this is fine against someone with those stats. [/ QUOTE ] its what I would do i don't like reraising and certainly dont like folding
|
|
#4
10-26-2007, 02:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL50 - AA facing 4Bet All-in
Now that you've re-raised, isn't a call almost forced due to pot size vs. remaining stack?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
