Is this correct way of thinking ?

[punter11235]

Suppose I raise UTG. My range is :66+,A9s+,K10s+,QTs+,ATo+, KJo+,QJo+ which I hope is fairly standard.
Only BB calls. The flop is :
K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

I bet and got raised. I call and the turn is :
2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
He bets.

Now I wonder what hands should I call. I did some calculations and it turns out that if I fold AQ or worse there always raising the flop and leading the turn with nothing will be profitable strategy agaisnt me. If I call with AQ always bluffign will lose money.
I think the following is implied by this :
-I should never call with AJ there unless I suspect that my opponent is bluffing way too much
-I should never fold AQ or better there unless I suspect my opponent is bluffing way too less.

Is it correct ?

[dcb777]

I agree with what you said given an average player, except i fold AQ here against a normal player quite a bit

[shockdaworld]

Against a 100% unknown I guess this is an ok way to look at it. But after 1 hand against a particular opponent, you should develop some kind of read and not think in those terms

[punter11235]

To be more specific my question is if you use this kind (or similair) technique to develop "default" plays and then play more "hard" or "soft" based on your reads or its not that useful and basically all play is based on reads ?