|
|
#91
11-13-2007, 03:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
Narena, what is your ptbb/100 at NL400? [/ QUOTE ] Small and positive from a very small, meaningless sample. 
|
|
#92
11-13-2007, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
and to the guy with that sample of a million nits, it tells me A)I should play FTP, and B) You probably have those results because the nits have to play more hands due to their [censored] winrates. And is that the standard PTBB? or the one that's just BB/100 cause I know you can change the option in PT and running at 6ptbb playing 20/5 over 800k hands seems blasphemous. In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+... [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure about Point A, but Point B makes no sense. It's BB/100 (senseless using ptBB when referring to NL- other than it's the PT default.) I'd say 7.5-8BB/100 (4ptBB/100) is about the absolute max you can expect from 1/2 playing 12+ tables over a significant sample (say 500k)
|
|
#93
11-13-2007, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
For those that are confused, Narena's results are in BB/100, not in ptbb/100. Just divide the results by 2 if you want to compare apples to apples. [/ QUOTE ] WTF!!! you're kidding right? I haven't done the math but im going to right now!!
|
|
#94
11-13-2007, 03:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For those that are confused, Narena's results are in BB/100, not in ptbb/100. Just divide the results by 2 if you want to compare apples to apples. [/ QUOTE ] WTF!!! you're kidding right? I haven't done the math but im going to right now!! [/ QUOTE ] omfg, it's true. All along i thought this was 6ptbb/100...I'm sorry Narena, but I was really impressed with your graph before mainly because of your small pfr % I didn't realize this was only bb/100.  THE BOTS HAVE OVER +4ptbb/100!? How did i not see this before!!?!? lol
|
|
#95
11-13-2007, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
Your posts make me laugh. Bring us more of your wit.
[ QUOTE ] I mean 17+ VPIP = Good. [/ QUOTE ] That's what I thought. Just making sure.
|
|
#96
11-13-2007, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
this is my FR graph for the past 3months, its about 60% 1/2, 33% .5/1, and the rest is 2/4, with <1khands .25/.5, .1/.25
 position stats  timed my switch to 1/2 perfectly [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#97
11-13-2007, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] For those that are confused, Narena's results are in BB/100, not in ptbb/100. Just divide the results by 2 if you want to compare apples to apples. [/ QUOTE ] WTF!!! you're kidding right? I haven't done the math but im going to right now!! [/ QUOTE ] omfg, it's true. All along i thought this was 6ptbb/100...I'm sorry Narena, but I was really impressed with your graph before mainly because of your small pfr % I didn't realize this was only bb/100. [/ QUOTE ] Yep, only BB/100. Those figures (or even close to them) would be virtually impossible if quoting ptBB (over a significant sample) especially considering that the top players from that table of results are >=12 tables.
|
|
#98
11-13-2007, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
Here's my graph, I don't really want to show my stats. I'm a bit lazy when it comes to cropping.
 Renton, look at your blue line and and compare it to this graph. This is me at NL200 for a brief period moving down from NL400. Now this is running bad... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#99
11-13-2007, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
underperforming sets and all the other stuff has cost you about 4K (rough estimate).
Next time try this:   The red circle shows my strategic move to PL400 for 30 hands where I sucked out with my KK vs AA for a $1100 pot. It also shows as a spike in the luck graph.
|
|
#100
11-13-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
too eazy, You kill me. We need yo get you signed to a 10 post a day contract or something. [ QUOTE ] In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+... [/ QUOTE ] Do you mean at least (18vpip==good) or at most (18vpip==bad)? [ QUOTE ] And is that the standard PTBB? [/ QUOTE ] A little arithmetic would show the latter, BB/100. Anyway. His vpip is ~10 UTG & UTG+1. So he's playing pairs and AK roughly. Is it your suspicion that he's over committing to his big pairs? Raising too many small pairs that are difficult to play post flop? Some combination of both? [/ QUOTE ] pairs plus AK = (13*.45) + 1.2 = 7.05 +AQ = 8.25 +KQ = 9.45 +AJs = 9.85 Easy on too eazy. he knows what he is talking about.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
