|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: NL | |||
| 0 -20K hands |
   
|
42 | 46.67% |
| 20K - 30K |
  
|
21 | 23.33% |
| 30K - 40K |
  
|
8 | 8.89% |
| 40K - 50K |
  
|
7 | 7.78% |
| 50K - 100K |
  
|
7 | 7.78% |
| 100K+ |
  
|
5 | 5.56% |
| Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
02-24-2007, 04:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9 Player Turbos Imbalanced?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] There is no skill or strategy involved in peeking a wolf night 0. It's pure luck. [/ QUOTE ] Tell that to Shorty. [/ QUOTE ] Having the seer peek whoever they want on n0 is basically a rand. The wolves are already randed. Giving the seer a choice of 3 people to peek, and getting back one villager would be a good compromise. You can still peek the good players, and you would not get a wolf on n0. What do you all think about this?? [/ QUOTE ] i absolutely hate this idea 
|
|
#42
02-24-2007, 04:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 9 Player Turbos Imbalanced?
I have an even better idea, half of the time we play random peek half of the time we play with normal format.
Mod rands format before turbo, only the seer knows which format was used.
|
|
#43
02-24-2007, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 9 Player Turbos Imbalanced?
[ QUOTE ]
I have an even better idea, half of the time we play random peek half of the time we play with normal format. Mod rands format before turbo, only the seer knows which format was used. [/ QUOTE ] Wow, I like that a lot!
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
