25NL: TPTK C/C River Standard Here?

[Snafu'd]

Villain in this hand was running 19/14/1.3 100+ hands. Only history was I won a big pot off of him in a blind vs blind where I raised a limper w/ TT in the sb, he calls in the bb, limper folds. Flop was T high and the final board had no overs. I bet every street and he called down, never raised once and showed down pocket Jacks.

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.10/$0.25 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $64.95
BB: $40.10
Hero (UTG): $47.60
MP: $24.90
CO: $30.10
BTN: $39.65

Preflop: Hero is dealt (6 Players)
<font color="red">Hero raises to $0.85</font>, MP calls $0.85, 4 folds

Flop: ($2.05) (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $1.55</font>, MP calls $1.55

Turn: ($5.15) (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $3.00</font>, MP calls $3.00

River: ($11.15) (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">MP bets $6.00</font>, Hero calls $6.00

Also, thoughts on turn bet size?

[TTStrangler]

This may be a nitty response but considering Villain's history I would probably just call too. You probably could have gone 4 on the turn.

[Harry Fong]

Raise more preflop

I like the check on the river. You are looking good and no obvious draws were made on the river. I think with a passive player like this it is better to check the river to induce a bluff as a call from villian will occur less.

[Iwineverypot]

[ QUOTE ]
Raise more preflop

I like the check on the river. You are looking good and no obvious draws were made on the river. I think with a passive player like this it is better to check the river to induce a bluff as a call from villian will occur less.

[/ QUOTE ]

This makes no sense. If you think he is passive, betting is obviously the optimal play. Passives call, they don't bluff very often. If he's agressive then it's a different story, but i don't see how ur justifying c/c is correct by saying he's passive.

[mookboi]

Bet more on turn. River standard.

[traz]

standard line, I like

[CPFB]

think you played it fine