$50nl: read allows large overbet on river?

[dkdrums]

Villain is like 75/5/0. I have been raising his limps and Cbetting him all day long. He calls w/ any piece but folds when he misses. When he hits, he c/c's all the way. Then this hand came up.

Given the read, what do you think?

Absolute Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50
6 players

UTG has ~$58
HERO w/ around $75
Converter

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is UTG+1 with 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $2.5</font>, 4 folds, UTG calls.

Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($5.75, 2 players)
UTG checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $4</font>, UTG calls.

Turn: 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($13.75, 2 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks.

River: 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($13.75, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">UTG bets $3.5</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises all-in $68.14</font>,

Edited to include stack sizes.. OOPS

[Iwineverypot]

DK u move up to 50NL? This is Crazysamson btw. I like the line. A villian like this def. isn't folding a straight, maybe not even a 7. A smaller raise might bring more hands along, but I really think against this guy this is how you get max value out of him.

[slickterp]

I agree. Given your read I'd say he go for it.

[dkdrums]

I play between 25 and 50nl usually. Depends on how I am feeling and how the bankroll is doing. Thanks for the comment.

BTW, your AP nickname is quite the misnomer.. lol

[Magaca]

I like it a lot!

Nh!

[relativity_x]

stack sizes would be nice.

The check turn is good for a river bluff by him.

I doubt he calls any raise on the river because his bet looks like a cheap bluff to take the pot down.

[Iwineverypot]

Lol very true. I've been working on loosening up more but it's a long and arduous journey.

[dkdrums]

Was editing my post as you made yours sir. Don't forget that this villain is not aggressive whatsoever, therefore I didn't really check the turn to induce a bluff as much as control the pot, since I expect he would have a straight there a lot. With his one pair and two pair hands, he would call another bet on the river anyway.

Even though his bet on the river was small, it suggested that he had a hand he was willing to go broke with IMO, given that his aggression is so low. He is not the type of player to try a bluff on a scary board.

Thanks for your comments.

[dkdrums]

[ QUOTE ]
I didn't really check the turn to induce a bluff as much as control the pot, since I expect he would have a straight there a lot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does anyone go for 3 streets of value against this guy?

[Kasane]

I'd just bet the turn and build a pot. Sure, there's a 4 straight on the board, but it's really unlikely the 6 made a straight for any hand but 87.

Especially given villain description, I would bet this all the way.