|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Biological Life the Product of Intelligent Design?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You are most patently wrong, if this is what you are claiming. Randomness exists. [/ QUOTE ] or it doesn't. You couldn't possibly tell, I'll even explain why if you like. [/ QUOTE ]Please do. I'd be very interested to learn the proof for the total determinism of everything! [ QUOTE ] Though none of this has anything to do with god. [/ QUOTE ] It has everything to do with the question of God! (I.e. whether a Creator exists or not.) If randomness does not exist in the universe, then the probability of the existence of a creator/designer of the universe goes up insanely. Mickey Brausch |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Biological Life the Product of Intelligent Design?
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You are most patently wrong, if this is what you are claiming. Randomness exists. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- or it doesn't. You couldn't possibly tell, I'll even explain why if you like. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do. I'd be very interested to learn the proof for the total determinism of everything! [/ QUOTE ] No, the reason you are wrong to claim you can tell if X exists is not a proof that X doesn't exist. I think that's obvious but I can explain if you like. [ QUOTE ] Though none of this has anything to do with god. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It has everything to do with the question of God! (I.e. whether a Creator exists or not.) If randomness does not exist in the universe, then the probability of the existence of a creator/designer of the universe goes up insanely. [/ QUOTE ] Sounds unlikely but some proofs that randomness exists would prove god didn't exist (sadly such a proof cannot exist even if randomness does). You can see why. chez |
|
|