|
|
|
|
#1
01-13-2007, 01:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] So it's fully possible that bk is not currently a winning 10/20 player, and to say that because I suggest this I dont understand variance is ridiculous. [/b] [/ QUOTE ] You could say I'm not a winning 100/200 online player would be reasonable at least and possibly true. But 10/20? Get a grip on reality. You don't understand [censored] if you think that, not just variance. [/ QUOTE ] I cant speak for your particular case as I havent seen you play. The guy I talk of on absolute would have been a winning player at 100/200 when I first played with him, and now is a solid donater in the 75 and 150 games. So it's possible. [/ QUOTE ] 75/150 and 10/20 are worlds apart. [/ QUOTE ] I should have clarified. I dont think he would beat 10/20 right now. 
|
|
#2
01-13-2007, 01:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Variance
Oh I dont know how many hands of lhe I have btw, but its less than half a mill.
|
|
#3
01-13-2007, 01:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Variance
Right... i mean FWIW i think _1_ had something like 500k+ hands at 10-20 at 2-3 BB/100 before breaking even for something like 150k hands. He can clarifying if that's of, but you see what i mean about how it just happens eventually.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
