Steps on Stars

[BryanSPokerStars]

[ QUOTE ]
I would prefer 6(a) only.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the choice is 6 & 6a or only 6, which do you choose?

All the best,

Bryan S.
Tournaments Administrator
PokerStars Poker Room Management Team

[Zetack]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would prefer 6(a) only.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the choice is 6 & 6a or only 6, which do you choose?

All the best,

Bryan S.
Tournaments Administrator
PokerStars Poker Room Management Team

[/ QUOTE ]

Seemed obvious from my reply, but since I like 6(a) better, then having both 6 and 6(a) is clearly superior to having 6 only.

[smartalecc5]

I would prefer 6 & 6a

[LuckyLloyd]

Bryan,

Please, please, please consider bringing in a steps system for the Sunday Million on a weekly basis. I suggest that it would be extremely popular.

Thanks,

Lloyd.

[dcviperboy]

[ QUOTE ]
Bryan,

Please, please, please consider bringing in a steps system for the Sunday Million on a weekly basis. I suggest that it would be extremely popular.

Thanks,

Lloyd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Also, a Steps tab maybe to sort them easier

[Th3_Ic0n]

Very nice idea with 6 and 6a I hope the new one is implemented.

[Perplexity]

Why not have 6a pay 1 seat, 3 redos, and $600 cash?

[schwah]

[ QUOTE ]
Why not have 6a pay 1 seat, 3 redos, and $600 cash?

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed

also if you add 1 table step 6s, i doubt the 2 tables will ever fill

[CharlieDontSurf]

my 2 cents:

stick with what u guys are planning

PCA Step 6a: 9 players, 1 package, cash to places 2 through 7
(2nd/3rd: $1,500 / 4th/5th: $1,000 / 6th/7th: $500)

over the 1 seat, 3 redos, and 600 cash idea.


though I do agree that 18man sats will probably never fill up once u create these 1 table Level 6's

[kindling]

I would prefer 6 & 6a over just 6. The fact that those buying in directly would NOT like 6a makes it more likely I would want to play it. I have no problem working up from Step 1, if I have a better chance to cash out something at the top even without winning the package.