|
|
#11
04-28-2006, 04:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Difference between $22s and $109s
[ QUOTE ]
What kind of ROI would you expect to average over long-term? [/ QUOTE ] 7-12% is solid-good at 109sp. 
|
|
#12
04-28-2006, 05:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $22s and $109s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What kind of ROI would you expect to average over long-term? [/ QUOTE ] 7-12% is solid-good at 109sp. [/ QUOTE ] Solid-good does not give the right idea about 7-12%, I think. If you get 7-12% you belong to the top 0.5 percentile of all $109 players that play more than 3 of them per week.
|
|
#13
04-28-2006, 05:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $22s and $109s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What kind of ROI would you expect to average over long-term? [/ QUOTE ] 7-12% is solid-good at 109sp. [/ QUOTE ] Solid-good does not give the right idea about 7-12%, I think. If you get 7-12% you belong to the top 0.5 percentile of all $109 players that play more than 3 of them per week. [/ QUOTE ] Edit: Yes I pulled that right out of my butt and while I think it is maybe not a very good estimate it definitely gives a better sense of reality.
|
|
#14
04-28-2006, 05:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $22s and $109s
25-30% ROI after 275 22er means something like -50% to +30% ROI at the 109ers and about -20% to +50% at the 22er.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
