Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-12-2007, 04:14 PM
budblown budblown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Smelling the 6 ft Kush plant
Posts: 450
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

The US won't pay, period. All this is going to do is give more support to Barney Franks effort to repeal UIGEA so we don't have to pay. Once the US legalizes the financial transactions to online gaming sites the sites then can be based in the US. Expect most of the sites to move their ops to the US - especially the ones who left after UIGEA was put into law.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-12-2007, 04:20 PM
grdred944 grdred944 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,475
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

This is nonsense.

China says eff-u to the U.S. when America whines about piracy and we say eff-u to the EU when it comes to online gaming. No offense to anyone who believes this nonsense but those who think the US would actually spend 20% of its annual military budget to satisfy a WTO imposed penalty related to online gaming is on crack.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-12-2007, 04:22 PM
Halfpoint Halfpoint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 436
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

WTO,UIGEA,UN........ we all saw that the US Govt will do whatever it wants whenever it wants. The UN was supposed to be able to stop its members from going out on their own and attacking countries. Iraqi invasion???!?!?

gg UN and WTO
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-12-2007, 04:46 PM
beanie beanie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 517
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

I think the most interesting part of this is not the political stuff or morality, the interesting part is their just isn't enough votes to make this legal. So they voted to make it illegal just so no one else could benefit.

They took their ball and went home. All that morality crap and "click your mouse, lose your house" stuff was just a farce.

These next elections will matter though because if it does go the wrong way I would expect this to get about 10 times worse than it has. The accelerator hasn't been pushed because there is just enough pressure to stop a full scale attack.

I also agree with most others, China does not care and blows off the WTO routinely. If you thought we lost freedoms before just wait until these Wild Wild West threats come true. They can't get the guys in Antigua but they can get you.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:08 PM
pete fabrizio pete fabrizio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: big-ass yard
Posts: 2,250
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thats a great reason for nobody to ever vote for a dumb ass republican again.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, go ahead and vote for Hillary and watch your taxes, businesses, health care, and the war on terror implode.

[/ QUOTE ]

More importantly, let's not pretend that the Democrats in the U.S. are gambling-friendly. Or, for that matter, WTO-friendly.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:12 PM
RikaKazak RikaKazak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Absolute Poker:hacker\'s paradise
Posts: 5,535
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

[ QUOTE ]
it doesnt matter what the WTO decides to do or how big the fine is because the US govt doesnt care and just wont pay it and theyll keep doing w/e they want.

[/ QUOTE ]

that pretty much sums it up
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:22 PM
Lee Ezell Lee Ezell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A random hotel
Posts: 17
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

As memory serves, this has zero to do with the UIGEA, but dates well prior to the passing of that. So even a full repeal of the UIGEA will have no influence on this WTO issue.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:25 PM
Thrahl Thrahl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thats a great reason for nobody to ever vote for a dumb ass republican again.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, go ahead and vote for Hillary and watch your taxes, businesses, health care, and the war on terror implode.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm prrrretty sure all those things are already FUBAR.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:27 PM
HorridSludgyBits HorridSludgyBits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 108
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thats a great reason for nobody to ever vote for a dumb ass republican again.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, go ahead and vote for Hillary and watch your taxes, businesses, health care, and the war on terror implode.

[/ QUOTE ]

More importantly, let's not pretend that the Democrats in the U.S. are gambling-friendly. Or, for that matter, WTO-friendly.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, you just hope that stopping gambling is a lower priority for them than for republicans.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:40 PM
captZEEbo captZEEbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: blog: Oct 23- Diary MD-pt 4
Posts: 6,927
Default Re: US faces US$100 billion fine for web gambling ban

[ QUOTE ]
Thats a great reason for nobody to ever vote for a dumb ass republican again.

[/ QUOTE ]

edit: This is Ron Paul. He will solve all the world's problems if you remember to vote for him [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.