Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2007, 03:44 AM
sevencard2003 sevencard2003 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: kansas
Posts: 258
Default murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

am curious to know how this guys appt bodes for online poker. any ideas??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2007, 05:02 AM
Legislurker Legislurker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 728
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070917/D8RN04OO0.html

He is a Giuliana guy, a law and order guy, and a terrorist judge according to that peice. Thats 3 strikes I think.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2007, 07:41 AM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

Mukasey had a very solid reputation as a federal judge. The fact that he presided over terrorism trials says nothing about his political views whatsoever. All it shows is that he was able to handle high-profile cases, which often presented novel issues.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2007, 10:36 AM
Legislurker Legislurker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 728
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

Im starting to wonder with what Ive read so far whether or not this is a tacit endorsement of Rudy as the anointed successor. This is one of his close buds. Sort of the old school I'm richer and better educated than you so fear my [censored] wrath soulmates.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:06 PM
fnurt fnurt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

I never appeared before Judge Mukasey, but many of my colleagues did, here in NYC. He has an outstanding reputation.

He is a Reagan-era conservative and I doubt he has much interest in appeasing the FoF types.

He is also a genuine expert in terrorism issues - having presided over some of the most high-profile terrorism prosecutions in history - and I suspect he will be devoting his attention to REAL priorities for our nation, as opposed to crap like porn and online gambling.

Maybe there's something more specific in his background, but I see every reason to be optimistic about this pick, especially relative to other nominations we could have seen from the present administration.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:51 PM
Legislurker Legislurker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 728
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

Maybe Im not a lawyer, but shouldn't fighting the "war on terror" be done by Homeland Security and DoD? Id think the DoJ is around to deal with crap like porn and gambling and corruption and international crime? Sure, there may be some terror elements, but it should be a small part of what DoJ does.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2007, 03:49 PM
oldbookguy oldbookguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wvgeneralstore.com
Posts: 820
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general


I think as we see what the dems have to say will help our insight and how (and we know he will) Kyl frames the UIGEA questions to him and how he answers.

That, I think, is really all that will matter to Kyl; how much effort, time and resources he is will to devote to Internet Gaming.

obg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2007, 04:34 PM
JPFisher55 JPFisher55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 963
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe Im not a lawyer, but shouldn't fighting the "war on terror" be done by Homeland Security and DoD? Id think the DoJ is around to deal with crap like porn and gambling and corruption and international crime? Sure, there may be some terror elements, but it should be a small part of what DoJ does.

[/ QUOTE ]

But that's not the American way. Now we go to court and litigate. Seriously, you're right.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-17-2007, 04:48 PM
fnurt fnurt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe Im not a lawyer, but shouldn't fighting the "war on terror" be done by Homeland Security and DoD? Id think the DoJ is around to deal with crap like porn and gambling and corruption and international crime? Sure, there may be some terror elements, but it should be a small part of what DoJ does.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the Pentagon should pretty much be in charge of invading countries and the DoJ should pretty much be in charge of deciding what to do with people we arrest.

Most of what we do in the "war on terror" is intelligence and police work. These things need to happen within some sort of legal framework.

Yeah, Gonzales pretty much left all the complicated legal crap for other people to worry about, but he's not really my model for an Attorney General.

It's a side point anyway. I really don't see this guy, a well-respected retired judge with a generous pension, accepting the position of Attorney General with a year left in Bush's term just so he can shut down some porn shops. I can't see online gambling being high on his list of priorities.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-17-2007, 05:09 PM
Skallagrim Skallagrim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Live Free or Die State
Posts: 1,071
Default Re: murskansky or however u spell it--the new atty general

"It's a side point anyway. I really don't see this guy, a well-respected retired judge with a generous pension, accepting the position of Attorney General with a year left in Bush's term just so he can shut down some porn shops. I can't see online gambling being high on his list of priorities."

I pretty much agree with this. There is just so much to do to turn the DO"Just Us" back into a DOJustice, that online gambling will not be a priority.

But thats not to say it wont get some attention; certainly the regs will finally get written. Though with some luck an old time conservative like this one may be inclined to order simple regs that look good but in reality accomplish little and keep the banks happy. We can hope anyway.

Skallagrim
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.