|
|
#42
11-05-2007, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
im on noble, im also on ongame.
the games on ipoker dont appear to be that appealing atm. ive really been avoiding playing on noble, i play 100/200NL. |
|
#43
11-05-2007, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
opinions about 100NL swampmonkey, spewey or Lag? [/ QUOTE ] I would say neither? I have him 100% standard 2p2'er 22/19/3, but I never see him making moves, and he seems too passive postflop, W$wsf is pretty low... He ranks as one of the "decent" 100NL regs though, better than most. |
|
#44
11-05-2007, 02:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] opinions about 100NL swampmonkey, spewey or Lag? [/ QUOTE ] I would say neither? I have him 100% standard 2p2'er 22/19/3, but I never see him making moves, and he seems too passive postflop, W$wsf is pretty low... He ranks as one of the "decent" 100NL regs though, better than most. [/ QUOTE ] I got him at 23/21/4.6 over 571 hands, and I think he is making moves, but I am not sure. W$wsf is 48, so taht is not low. |
|
#47
11-05-2007, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] opinions about 100NL swampmonkey, spewey or Lag? [/ QUOTE ] I would say neither? I have him 100% standard 2p2'er 22/19/3, but I never see him making moves, and he seems too passive postflop, W$wsf is pretty low... He ranks as one of the "decent" 100NL regs though, better than most. [/ QUOTE ] I got him at 23/21/4.6 over 571 hands, and I think he is making moves, but I am not sure. W$wsf is 48, so taht is not low. [/ QUOTE ] swampMonkey Over 800 hands is 22/19/3 with 39% W$WSF. Hatteware is [censored] terrible, really really bad. |
|
#49
11-05-2007, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
It might be average but it's not good, I think 42ish is standard for his stats.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
