anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment - Page 6

NT=TOOLBOX · #51 11-13-2007, 06:34 AM

Renton your won at showdown is remarkably high for someone who is running bad. TBH i think that you have been making mistakes based on what you think your image is when its really not. U play small pots well but i think your making some big ones you dont have to =)

I hope i qualify btw =)

NT=TOOLBOX · #52 11-13-2007, 06:39 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Dude why post at all if you're just going to troll?

Also, 20/16 ftw. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont consider it trolling, i do post strat somtimes man so shut up. Im always disagreed with which tbh makes tons of sense but also irratates me trying to discuss plays that work with people who are standard 2p2 boneheads. was your question rhetorical though... cuase it seems kinda rhetorical.

NT=TOOLBOX · #53 11-13-2007, 06:40 AM

o and how the hell else am i supposed to get this account name to carpul tunnel fast enough?

Eternal · #54 11-13-2007, 06:45 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Renton your won at showdown is remarkably high for someone who is running bad. TBH i think that you have been making mistakes based on what you think your image is when its really not. U play small pots well but i think your making some big ones you dont have to =)

I hope i qualify btw =)

[/ QUOTE ]

I totally agree, his WSD is pretty good. That's the reason why I think u should stick this into Poker EV. But remember, Poker EV is just an idea. Just because the red line is above the blue line, it doesn't necessarily mean you're running bad bad...you basically just want to see where the blue and green line stand

Kos13 · #55 11-13-2007, 06:59 AM

I suck, so no advice here, but isn't the BB winrate of (-0.24) really low? Maybe you're leaking a bit there somehow.

nation · #56 11-13-2007, 07:09 AM

very slightly low, it's not that bad.

this is a really small sample size.

Kos13 · #57 11-13-2007, 07:11 AM

[ QUOTE ]
very slightly low, it's not that bad.

this is a really small sample size.

[/ QUOTE ]

Quick hijack then: typical loss-rate in SB and BB?

nation · #58 11-13-2007, 07:14 AM

i dunno, i run at (.20) and (.04)

ninjadanger · #59 11-13-2007, 07:24 AM

you gotta be the [censored] man if you are stuck AND have an overall win rate in the green. booyakasha.

fwiw I had a ~40k hand breakeven streak in October and it sucked. my stats are similar but slightly nittier at ~14/11. TAG style is the ish but I think you have to put up with this kind of sample. because we raise a high percentage of our hands pf this obviously leads to chronic cbets, the occasional double barrels, and the rare (for me anyway) well-timed triple barrel.

my point being that a lot of bets are going in early and often. when a 16/13 starts running into jerks flopping monsters our money lost without seeing showdown goes through the roof. PokerEV can help graph-style to look at that. if you couple a scenario like that with a few coolers and some suckouts you got a [censored] sample.

HesseJam · #60 11-13-2007, 07:51 AM

Another stat: Folded to river bet 73%. Isn't that a tad too high? Wouldn't that make any river bet against you immediately profitable? And isn't that something other regulars would pick off? Maybe you are afraid of being labeled a pay-off-monkey when you show down 2nd or 3rd pair and lose over 50% of your hands with it?