Current Quarterback Controversies

[SuperUberBob]

As for mine:

Chiefs: Croyle. Chiefs are 30th in scoring offense. You have nothing to lose by putting Croyle in.

Bills: Edwards. I'm pretty sure Losman will get his job when he comes back from injury. But if the Bills want to have the best chance to win, they have to sacrifice loyalty to do it.

Jets: Clemens. Pennington's recent ankle injury and weak arm has really limited the range of the Jets offense. Clemens forces defenses to defend the long ball and adds another dimension to their defense.

Raiders: Culpepper. Now that he's got his foot in the door, he should be the full-time starter. McCown was merely a holdover.

Falcons: Harrington. Harrington hasn't done as bad as a lot of people say. Keep in mind that he was basically thrown into the spot because Vick is an idiot. The offense was completely designed around Vick and now Petrino had to redesign the entire offense for Joey Harrington. Leftwich hasn't played much yet, but should sit on the pine for the time being.

Vikings: Jackson. I have no faith in him, but at least he has an upside and can actually improve over time.

Saints: Brees. He's playing horribly, but I don't think you can blame him entirely. He has no o-line at all.

Colts: Sorgi. Manning is way past his prime. Tony Dungy has to start looking towards the future and bench Manning for Sorgi.

[tolbiny]

Brady Quinn or Derek Anderson?

[Richard Tanner]

I swear to god, when I read the title I thought "Man if I was doing this I'd put Manning/Sorgi in to be cute". Damn your cleverness OP. Well played.

Cody

[vixticator]

[ QUOTE ]
Brady Quinn or Derek Anderson?

[/ QUOTE ]This is probably the best one. Anderson if the Browns staff thinks Quinn is not ready yet. He's played reasonably well, sometimes. I think he's got a good future as a backup somewhere and could develop into a starter. Big dude, nice arm, not the best decisions but he's played how many games? Decent potential IMO.

But, Quinn is clearly the future right? So, I go with him WHENEVER I think he is ready. Period.

[SuperUberBob]

[ QUOTE ]
Brady Quinn or Derek Anderson?

[/ QUOTE ]

This isn't much of a controversy...yet. The Browns are pretty committed to Anderson so long as they maintain a semi-decent record. If they start to tank, then there'll be more people calling for Brady Quinn to start.

[ QUOTE ]
I swear to god, when I read the title I thought "Man if I was doing this I'd put Manning/Sorgi in to be cute". Damn your cleverness OP. Well played.

Cody

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you. I almost put in Brady/Matt Cassel, but thought that Manning/Sorgi would be funnier.

[Veecee]

[ QUOTE ]
Chiefs: Croyle. They're going nowhere, might as well start the youngster.

Jets: Pennington, unless they seriously think Clemens could be the future.

Vikings: Holcomb, unless they seriously think Tavaris could be the future.


[/ QUOTE ]


This doesn't make sense. DUCY?

[tarheeljks]

there can't really be a qb controversy in no

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Chiefs: Croyle. They're going nowhere, might as well start the youngster.

Jets: Pennington, unless they seriously think Clemens could be the future.

Vikings: Holcomb, unless they seriously think Tavaris could be the future.


[/ QUOTE ]


This doesn't make sense. DUCY?

[/ QUOTE ]

sure it does, it just assumes that the latter 2 young qb's have little potential

[lastchance]

Wrong on Jets, because Pennington is actually good.

The Vikings actually have a shot still to do something.

Not only does Damon Huard suck, the chiefs are dead.

[PokerFink]

[ QUOTE ]
Brady Quinn or Derek Anderson?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ooooh good one. Depends on how Quinn looks in practice. When/if he's ready, might as well throw him to the wolves.

[Veecee]

Yeah but "They're not going anywhere, might as well put the youngster in" applies to the latter 2 teams, no?

Although moreso the Jets than the Vikes. I agree that the Vikes have a shot to do something, mainly because of their D. The Jets D is awful.