relative playability of starting hands, other things being equal?

[fraac]

(Repost from SSNL.)

Restricted to current most popular game conditions: online, no-limit holdem, 6max, small-mid stakes. Like SC rankings but non-computable, so compiled from Pokertracker databases of good players. Much useful information would be encoded in such a ranking list, though I grant it seems unscientific, ephemeral and instinctively scoffworthy. For example, it seems reasonable that a player would know call/raise ratios for the different 2-card hand classes, know adjustments for position, stack sizes, opponents, know everything except the initial playability of his hand.

As I wrote in the first topic, attempting and failing to pique curiosity, 72o is only the worst starting hand if the results say it is.

Has anyone tried this?