|
|
|
|
#1
10-20-2007, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
3/6- confusion vs technologic
my image should be a bit tighter than at 5/10+
POKERSTARS GAME #12746972790: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2007/10/20 - 19:38:56 (ET) Table 'Shajna II' 6-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: Sauce123 ($1128.75 in chips) Seat 2: technologic ($1412.75 in chips) Seat 4: duyle ($260.60 in chips) Seat 5: kondos 1 ($154 in chips) Seat 6: krooptroop ($229.55 in chips) D.R.JORA will be allowed to play after the button duyle: posts small blind $3 kondos 1: posts big blind $6 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Sauce123 [Ac Kc] krooptroop: folds Sauce123: raises $15 to $21 technologic: calls $21 duyle: folds kondos 1: folds *** FLOP *** [7s 8d Ah] Sauce123: bets $39 technologic: calls $39 *** TURN *** [7s 8d Ah] [As] Sauce123: checks technologic: bets $90 Sauce123: raises $204 to $294 technologic: raises $1058.75 to $1352.75 and is all-in Sauce123 said, "ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww" Sauce123 said, "god" 
|
|
#7
10-20-2007, 11:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6- confusion vs technologic
[ QUOTE ]
don't c/r. bet turn. if you're gonna c/r anywhere, make it the river [/ QUOTE ] Agree. I usually bet, but c/c and c/r is way more likely to get the money in the way we want and it tilts the [censored] out of 3/6 regs
|
|
#8
10-20-2007, 08:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6- confusion vs technologic
looks like a fold as played. i mean yeah in order for him to have a hand he woulda had to slowplay the flop, but all you've shown is massive strength so far and he's not the type for huge bluffs, and there's no way he does this w AQ imo.
|
|
#10
10-20-2007, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6- confusion vs technologic
c/r is sexy awesome with sauce's image at the tables, how does techno play stats wise, and does he make big plays at pots?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
