Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: From the BB I am losing PTBB/hand
I am making a profit (and am sure of that) 1 3.57%
0.00 - 0.05 2 7.14%
0.05 - 0.10 4 14.29%
0.10 - 0.15 6 21.43%
0.15 - 0.20 2 7.14%
0.20 - 0.25 2 7.14%
0.25 - 0.30 2 7.14%
0.30 - 0.35 0 0%
0.35 - 0.40 0 0%
0.40 - 0.45 2 7.14%
0.45-0.50 0 0%
results only 7 25.00%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #921  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:42 PM
Russ M. Russ M. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Winning the Heisman
Posts: 11,368
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

I'm stunned they called Caldwell's number again after dropping two sure TDs when he was wide open.
Reply With Quote
  #922  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:43 PM
iggymcfly iggymcfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,784
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

How is that less interference than the play that gave the Colts their touchdown? The only thing I can think of is that they ruled it uncatchable because Caldwell was the receiver.
Reply With Quote
  #923  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:43 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

[ QUOTE ]
hahahah how is that not a flag?

[/ QUOTE ]

luckbox -> doomswitch obviously
Reply With Quote
  #924  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:43 PM
The X-Factor The X-Factor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Starting over
Posts: 3,197
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

Its only a make up call for the two Wayne no calls earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #925  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:43 PM
SoloAJ SoloAJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois State
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

Ricochet Caldwell....That's why they didn't cover him....

Both were splendid and made mys tomach hurt.

I still don't get how that wasnt a PI flag though..I mean we know he wouldnt have caught it anyway, but man.
Reply With Quote
  #926  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:44 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

I think refs decided DBs can put their hands all over the WR jersey as long as they don't punch them in the jimmy first, or claw their eyes out.
Reply With Quote
  #927  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:44 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 16,088
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why not run to the end zone there?

[/ QUOTE ]

that only adds to the hilarity of the drop

[/ QUOTE ]

Running to the endzone is the wrong play. It makes it easier for the Colts' safeties to get coverage.

The receiver should be taking what the defense gives him. Complete the easy pass and then run it for 5 or more yards.
Reply With Quote
  #928  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:44 PM
SuperUberBob SuperUberBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In a dirty apartment
Posts: 6,560
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

[ QUOTE ]
wow, what a noncall!

[/ QUOTE ]

Got a Benedict Arnold amongst the refs.
Reply With Quote
  #929  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:44 PM
The X-Factor The X-Factor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Starting over
Posts: 3,197
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

[ QUOTE ]
How is that less interference than the play that gave the Colts their touchdown? The only thing I can think of is that they ruled it uncatchable because Caldwell was the receiver.

[/ QUOTE ]

Funniest reply ever!!!!! LOLAMENTS
Reply With Quote
  #930  
Old 01-21-2007, 10:44 PM
kidcolin kidcolin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: get yo fishin right
Posts: 9,576
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***

[ QUOTE ]
How is that less interference than the play that gave the Colts their touchdown?

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno.. must not have been ruled "face guarding." Ask Simms.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.