POG Anniversary Game Thread

[freetokyonow]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Villager, actually. Especially a vanillager.

[/ QUOTE ]

well i disagree. I dont see a villager staying mum. He would at least say "OMG wtf ... guys im a villager." or something.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. He'd get bored because he has a boring role in a game where he doesn't know anybody's identities. So what if he gets lynched.

[/ QUOTE ]

then why even vote grindhouse? makes no sense to show up and just make a meaningless vote and leave when you are on the chopping block.

Guess we will agree to disagree here

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure it does. He'll get replaced if he doesn't at least make a post/vote.

Anyways, yeah, he could definitely be a wolf, but I think a vanillager does this in a game like this (anonymous) more often.

I doubt he's a power villager, though, so him dying probably wouldn't be the worst thing.

[Sasami]

sasami still wants to lynch yoko akimbo gingerbread or freshprince but pope pius is on the votable list so that is ok

[T. Bradshaw]

if he doesnt care about the game why would he care if he was replaced

[Ill Subliminal]

Well maybe we do have to lynch grindhouse. If he is the evil votebuyer, it will difintely remove some of the villager cred of the tutu wagon. Would the good votebuyer move a vote yesterday? That is the real question I am struggling with. At first I thought sure, because it really seemed like grindhouse was the more villagery of the two, but seeing the impact a smart good vote buyer could easily leave it alone and let the wagons get resolved the next day.

<u>[switch vote to grindhouese]</u>

[freetokyonow]

[ QUOTE ]
if he doesnt care about the game why would he care if he was replaced

[/ QUOTE ]

It's obvious he doesn't care about the game regardless of his role.

[Yoko Ono]

I agree with tokyo's conclusion.

And I am all for lynching somewhat low % wolves if they aren't power.

But I think grindhouse was less likely to be peeked, and so therefore, is a better lynch.

[Tom & Jerry]

Okay, I'm going to make an incredible read right now, and basically role-claim villager.

I think that I am the miller.
There's been a lot of talk about me -- and I haven't done anything particularly controversial or wolfy (in my opinion). The way that I've somehow been a center of discussion is rather strange. It's to such an extent that I believe that the wolves KNOW that I will show up wolf if I get lynched -- and the wolves will look good for it. People that have voted me so far need to seriously be looked at, and I will in a while.

Other bandwagons?
Akimbo?
Bradshaw?
Grindhouse?
Yoko?
Gingerbreadman?

ALL TERRIBLE.

That is exactly why even though
[ QUOTE ]
The pope wagon is basically random.

[/ QUOTE ]
which is true, a random lynch is better than any of the other possible bandwagons I see springing up. I could, for example, be just as fine with an im in ur forum lynch.

[freetokyonow]

[ QUOTE ]
Well maybe we do have to lynch grindhouse. If he is the evil votebuyer, it will difintely remove some of the villager cred of the tutu wagon. Would the good votebuyer move a vote yesterday? That is the real question I am struggling with. At first I thought sure, because it really seemed like grindhouse was the more villagery of the two, but seeing the impact a smart good vote buyer could easily leave it alone and let the wagons get resolved the next day.

<u>[switch vote to grindhouese]</u>

[/ QUOTE ]

qfwtf

[T. Bradshaw]

very interesting t &amp; j

[freetokyonow]

[ QUOTE ]
very interesting t &amp; j

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, T&amp;J is a smart cookie, but my opinion on his role hasn't changed.