ACism - property rights enforcement

[pvn]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

BS. This is getting old. Your posts are in the record. Everyone can see what you wrote. And I've already pointed out several times how you repeatedly dismissed any attempt to examine legitimacy.


[/ QUOTE ]

So rather than addressing the substance of my claim, and discussing the actual issue of the topic, you'd rather argue about me personally, in an attempt to discredit the argument.

For someone such as yourself who cries wolf so often about being on the recieving end of ad hominem attacks, this is awfully ironic, isn't it? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I stopped reading here. Do you even know what "ad hominem" means???

Pointing out inconsistencies in your argument is attacking YOUR ARGUMENT, not YOU.

Making smug comments insinuating that someone can't understand english is attacking the PERSON.

And note, I didn't say YOU are plagued by ignorance, I said YOUR POSTS are. You even QUOTED it. But don't worry, I'm sure you can work in another "maybe english is too hard for you" comment, and then cry about suffering ad hominem attacks.

Again, cite ad hominem, please. Put up or shut up.

[vulturesrow]

I know I'm only an ex-moderator, but maybe you guys could take this particular tangent to PMs?

[bkholdem]

[ QUOTE ]
I know I'm only an ex-moderator, but maybe you guys could take this particular tangent to PMs?

[/ QUOTE ]

NO WAY! This is my FAVORITE off all time thread in the politics forum. This thread is THE BALLS! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
Making smug comments insinuating that someone can't understand english is attacking the PERSON.


[/ QUOTE ]

There are a lot of folks on this board who didn't have english as their first language.

When you called my use of the term "waxing poetic" an ad hominem "attack", I kindly pointed out that it wasn't, just in case english isn't your first language.

To be honest, I couldn't think of any other reason someone would be stupid enough to misinterpret that descriptive phrase as a "vicious attack", unless something was lost in the translation.

I stand corrected. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure you can work in another "maybe english is too hard for you" comment,

[/ QUOTE ]

Holy misquote, batman!

But, based on your severe misinterpretations....the misquote may actually be very much the case. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
Put up or shut up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Um...nanny-nanny...boo-boo?

Sorry for being lame here, but I'm new to this stuff, and I'm trying to play along with your silliness.

Did I do it right? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
I know I'm only an ex-moderator, but maybe you guys could take this particular tangent to PMs?

[/ QUOTE ]

Will do, boss.

(To pvn) Hey douchebag, keep an eye on your PM's. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[Richard Tanner]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I know I'm only an ex-moderator, but maybe you guys could take this particular tangent to PMs?

[/ QUOTE ]

Will do, boss.

(To pvn) Hey douchebag, keep an eye on your PM's. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I went 700 replies with PVN, it's your turn. I'm with BK, this is too entertaining to hide.

Cody

[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm with BK, this is too entertaining to hide.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but the real question is does it have legitimacy?

[img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]