|
|
#81
10-03-2007, 05:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
How are those house prices on Elm Street?
|
|
#82
10-03-2007, 07:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] That each individual is endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are the rights to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness [/ QUOTE ][ QUOTE ] 3. Family: One husband and one wife with their children as divinely instituted [/ QUOTE ]Move along.. [/ QUOTE ] ...or as naturally planned, what's the difference? Obviously the natural plan is for the nuclear family unit. If you don't believe in God you still believe in Nature, right? Maybe some people should try to get past their distaste of religion and actually look at what's being worked towards. [/ QUOTE ] LOL, natural plan is for the nuclear family. ORLY The nuclear family is a minority event amongst humans. Get you facts right! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Maybe some people should try to get past their distaste of nature and see what is going on.
|
|
#85
10-03-2007, 09:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
[ QUOTE ]
Moveon's Times ad came a little too soon to have much impact, but if the Dems don't divorce themselves from Sorus there will be more fallout. [/ QUOTE ] Could someone please tell me what the difference is between Soros and Merdock?
|
|
#86
10-03-2007, 09:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Moveon's Times ad came a little too soon to have much impact, but if the Dems don't divorce themselves from Sorus there will be more fallout. [/ QUOTE ] Could someone please tell me what the difference is between Soros and Merdock? [/ QUOTE ] Never heard od Soras, but I know of Murdoch! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#87
10-03-2007, 09:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Copernicus. The republicans have thier own nightmare. There are a lot of republicans, me for instance, who are disenchanted with their own party. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#88
10-03-2007, 01:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
Nature. has. no. "plan". You can look at what occurs in nature most often, but as far as things like family go this wont be particularly useful. Just because something occurs in nature frequently doesn't say anything about whether it should or should not be held in value, nor does it say much about whether it will occur frequently in the future, because nature is always changing (and humans are part of nature)
[ QUOTE ] Eddie Izzard isn't gay? Really? [/ QUOTE ] He's a male lesbian.
|
|
#89
10-03-2007, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
Homosexuality in nature is a moot point when discussing child rearing because, well, homosexual creatures in nature would have a hard time having children.
With that said, I don't have much of an opinion on the idea of two men or two women adopting children. At the very least, ANYBODY adopting is screened pretty extensively, which is more than I can say for natural parents.
|
|
#90
10-03-2007, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Hi Copernicus. The republicans have thier own nightmare. There are a lot of republicans, me for instance, who are disenchanted with their own party. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] This is true; however, Hilary trumps all disenchantment tenfold. Republican problems don't result in creation of a socialist welfare state. See the current "children's health bill" and Hilary's "5k for babies" proposal. I will gladly take status quo over catastrophic social engineering tax increases.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
