***OFFICIAL NE vs SD THREAD***

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LMAO @ "The defender was just overpowered"

Best referee explanation for anything, ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

I gotta say that the old "personal foul, giving him the business" is still the best, but that was pretty good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Link plz.

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think any advantage that the pats got from videotaping the signals was small at best.

I just think the inevitable wave of, "LOLOLOL WE MUST HAVE BEEN CHEAING AMIRITE LOOK AT THE SCORE OMG" that we're going to get all week is annoying.

The pats are clearly really really really good, videotaping or no.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, as a pats fan, the reason it pissed me off was because people are saying things like 'brady wouldn't be that good without cheating' or 'would they have won all those super bowls without cheating?'

when in fact any advantage they gained from this cheating was no more than what you would get from having a couple guys in the stands with binoculars writing stuff down and trying to decode it, which any NFL team doing their due diligence is going to have.

i can see why people are pissed off at them for doing it because it's arrogant and obnoxious, but what they basically did was get information in a lazy way that they should have had to work a tiny bit harder for.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is either very false or Bellichick is a [censored] moron, you pick.

[NT!]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think any advantage that the pats got from videotaping the signals was small at best.

I just think the inevitable wave of, "LOLOLOL WE MUST HAVE BEEN CHEAING AMIRITE LOOK AT THE SCORE OMG" that we're going to get all week is annoying.

The pats are clearly really really really good, videotaping or no.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, as a pats fan, the reason it pissed me off was because people are saying things like 'brady wouldn't be that good without cheating' or 'would they have won all those super bowls without cheating?'

when in fact any advantage they gained from this cheating was no more than what you would get from having a couple guys in the stands with binoculars writing stuff down and trying to decode it, which any NFL team doing their due diligence is going to have.

i can see why people are pissed off at them for doing it because it's arrogant and obnoxious, but what they basically did was get information in a lazy way that they should have had to work a tiny bit harder for.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is either very false or Bellichick is a [censored] moron, you pick.

[/ QUOTE ]

based on belichick's whole 'my interpretation of the rules' shtick, i think he thought there was a loophole and goodell said 'lol, no.'

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think any advantage that the pats got from videotaping the signals was small at best.

I just think the inevitable wave of, "LOLOLOL WE MUST HAVE BEEN CHEAING AMIRITE LOOK AT THE SCORE OMG" that we're going to get all week is annoying.

The pats are clearly really really really good, videotaping or no.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, as a pats fan, the reason it pissed me off was because people are saying things like 'brady wouldn't be that good without cheating' or 'would they have won all those super bowls without cheating?'

when in fact any advantage they gained from this cheating was no more than what you would get from having a couple guys in the stands with binoculars writing stuff down and trying to decode it, which any NFL team doing their due diligence is going to have.

i can see why people are pissed off at them for doing it because it's arrogant and obnoxious, but what they basically did was get information in a lazy way that they should have had to work a tiny bit harder for.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is either very false or Bellichick is a [censored] moron, you pick.

[/ QUOTE ]

based on belichick's whole 'my interpretation of the rules' shtick, i think he thought there was a loophole and goodell said 'lol, no.'

[/ QUOTE ]


Your vote for "moron" has been recorded.

[DCJ311]

Game theory question: If SD scores a TD here should they go for 2, being down by 24? I vote yes.

[Hornacek]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm trying to figure out if NT! is leveling me.

[/ QUOTE ]

am i missing something here? i think i probably am



[/ QUOTE ]

turn on your sarcasm detector

reread my post again

if you need more help read BobJoeJim's post

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
Game theory question: If SD scores a TD here should they onside kick , being down by 24? I vote yes.

[/ QUOTE ]

[vixticator]

[ QUOTE ]
Game theory question: If SD scores a TD here should they go for 2, being down by 24? I vote yes.

[/ QUOTE ]For sure, and go for it every down more or less.

[vhawk01]

Norv Turner was like Mike Martz before Mike Martz was Mike Martz, wasn't he?

[pokergrader]

Gotta go for it here.