#81
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
Booooooo
HISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSs |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
I take exception to your s cat hing comment.
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
[ QUOTE ]
His last seven posts in this thread in SMP have been: picture of a cat ad hominem ad hominem picture of a cat picture of a cat picture of a cat picture of a cat Seems like the standard definition of a troll to me. I would send this request to an SMP mod but they haven't responded to the previous one or two times I've PMed them. [/ QUOTE ] |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
[ QUOTE ]
To all: What should happen if I started posting endless amounts of pictures and ad hominems in David Sklansky's threads, or any other thread in SMP, Politics or strategy forums? [/ QUOTE ] Ban hammer. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
Nielso,
In the spirit of the new ATF sticky, I'll give you a serious response. LOLcats are beloved at 2p2, virtually a protected class. (Think beedogs.) Of course one must present them into a thread judiciously, as you acknowledge in your reference to randomly posting them in a Sklansky thread. As evidenced by his custom title, "lolcat", kerowo is a trusted provider of lolcat goodness on the 2p2 forums. To summarize, you chose to fight a losing battle. I, for one, thank you though, for providing an opportunity for the lolcats to visit ATF! Please all to be continuing the Purrfection. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
In summary,
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
Neilsio self portrait....
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
[ QUOTE ]
Please all to be continuing the Purrfection. [/ QUOTE ] |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
Hamster Hijack!
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request for action concerning user \'kerowo\'
|
|
|