|
|
#81
11-02-2007, 05:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit N Go Madness on FTP
No one is crying, you multitablers are so thin skinned. It was just a suggestion about the promotion and a way to make it more suitable for everyone. Sorry to think out loud and offend anyone.
|
|
#82
11-02-2007, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sit N Go Madness on FTP
[ QUOTE ]
just because you arent capable of 12-16 tabling for a long period of time doesnt mean you should cry about it, its not some sort of unfair advantage, some people are better at some things than others so deal with it. also, there successful multitablers use one monitor and dont use a HUD. but if you think its going to make that much of a difference and bawl over it then go buy 12 monitors and pokeracehud and see how much things change ps: sdklaskdfjaskljdfklasjdfklsjdfkljaskdlfjklasfd [/ QUOTE ] yea, what does playing 12 tourneys and seeing who does the best show? absolutely nothing. maybe make it like 100 and then i would agree, but 12 means absolutely nothing. also, i am playing 16 tables at my gfs tonite, with one monitor and no pahud. and i have done it b4 its not that hard.
|
|
#86
11-02-2007, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sit N Go Madness on FTP
points are calculated the same way as the monthly ldrboard, so each buyin has different amounts for 1st through 4th. If I remember right, a 1st in a 11 gets you 13 pts whereas a 1st in a 6 gets like 8 or something.
|
|
#89
11-02-2007, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sit N Go Madness on FTP
[ QUOTE ]
What are we trying to "determine"? I thought the goal of the promotion was to give people a chance to win more prizes. Does 16 tabling "determine" anything I'm not aware of other then increased volume. [/ QUOTE ] Hint: the promotion's goal is something different, and has to do with "rake". Your nonsensical proposals are not conducive towards their goal.
|
|
#90
11-02-2007, 05:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sit N Go Madness on FTP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] just because you arent capable of 12-16 tabling for a long period of time doesnt mean you should cry about it, its not some sort of unfair advantage, some people are better at some things than others so deal with it. also, there successful multitablers use one monitor and dont use a HUD. but if you think its going to make that much of a difference and bawl over it then go buy 12 monitors and pokeracehud and see how much things change ps: sdklaskdfjaskljdfklasjdfklsjdfkljaskdlfjklasfd [/ QUOTE ] yea, what does playing 12 tourneys and seeing who does the best show? absolutely nothing. maybe make it like 100 and then i would agree, but 12 means absolutely nothing. also, i am playing 16 tables at my gfs tonite, with one monitor and no pahud. and i have done it b4 its not that hard. [/ QUOTE ] 12 nor 100 would determine much, but that's beside the point. If you're going to have a contest, it should be one where everyone has an equal shot at winning prizes. If you don't have at least a 20" screen (and even that's really cutting it slim for 16 tabling) and PAHUD, you stand as much chance of winning as someone leading MLB in hr's without steroids. But anyway, this is stupid and I'm going to bed.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
