#81
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
[ QUOTE ]
My whole point of reraising preflop was to first, take it down, and second to build a pot when the 3 comes. [/ QUOTE ] THEN WHAT THE [censored] IS THE PROBLEM HERE |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
[ QUOTE ]
sel, I've been pondering this very interesting hand for quite some time now. Lots of issues to take into consideration and lots of options as to how to play this hand. After giving it a few hours of thought, doing some hand range weighting analysis to figure out equities, and thinking through various meta-game issues at play in this hand, I've decided that the best option for you here is to call. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
how is there even this many posts on this thread? this is ridiculously easy call. do you think he open shoves KK? i dont. ship the nuts. holla
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
[ QUOTE ]
how is there even this many posts on this thread? this is ridiculously easy call. do you think he open shoves KK? i dont. ship the nuts. holla [/ QUOTE ] Who knows how a fish thinks? (another fish of course, that would be me [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] There are of course different kinds of fish, but here`s one theory. He`s scared of the flushdraw. Stacks are deep and he is not good at playing later streets + there are 4 other people in the pot. He takes the easy way out and just shoves it. The same reasoning puts AA out of his range. IMO its VERY unlikely he holds AA here, he would just shove it preflop, I mean, he is a fish who likes to raise preflop, he would just love the opportunity to raise more with AA (or KK). So, it might be KK, but still, you just have to call. His most likely hand would be 22. Heck, maybe he played K2suited. Fish dont think so much about what other people might have so when they flop a hand they see as a monster, they go with it. So ends MrMordens lecture: "Inside a Fishes Head" #1 |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
WHY IS THIS THREAD SO LONG IT IS RETARDED
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
Dude you cant post such a crazy flop, start a ridiculously long thread, and then not post the results. We all know you called and he showed T9s and spiked a spade on the river, but we want to be sure
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
[ QUOTE ]
Dude you cant post such a crazy flop, start a ridiculously long thread, and then not post the results. We all know you called and he showed T9s and spiked a spade on the river, but we want to be sure [/ QUOTE ] |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
Call or fold fine, but I'M DYING FOR SOME RESULTS!!????
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
[ QUOTE ]
forgive me if someone has asked this, i can't be bothered with 77 "call" replies... would this hand be interesting if he held 222? what do we think then? [/ QUOTE ] I insta-call here w/ AK vs the villain described. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/5 NL *Super Deep*
I Bet he folded and never got to see villains hand.
|
|
|