|
|
#871
04-26-2007, 12:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So you just let yourself die without claiming? Solid. [/ QUOTE ] Not claiming gave me a chance at more peeks. There is no angel this game. [/ QUOTE ] Not claiming means you die if LC keeps his mouth shut. You just didn't want to give out the info, since you were going to lose that night anyway. 
|
|
#872
04-26-2007, 12:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] So you just let yourself die without claiming? Solid. [/ QUOTE ] Not claiming gave me a chance at more peeks. There is no angel this game. [/ QUOTE ] Not claiming means you die if LC keeps his mouth shut. You just didn't want to give out the info, since you were going to lose that night anyway. [/ QUOTE ] I didn't keep my mouth shut. I mentioned killing dmk, in hopes that would sway the vote. It was a very close vote at that point.
|
|
#873
04-26-2007, 12:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
If you were really a seer, why would you use your vigilante kill on a total unknown on n1, when there would be a good chance that could peek a wolf or neutral on a future night?
|
|
#874
04-26-2007, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
If you were really a seer, why would you use your vigilante kill on a total unknown on n1, when there would be a good chance that could peek a wolf or neutral on a future night? [/ QUOTE ] Because I have a very good read on dmk, and wanted to have living peeks to give when I came out. Even MDD thought I was the seer yesterday.
|
|
#875
04-26-2007, 12:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you were really a seer, why would you use your vigilante kill on a total unknown on n1, when there would be a good chance that could peek a wolf or neutral on a future night? [/ QUOTE ] Because I have a very good read on dmk, and wanted to have living peeks to give when I came out. Even MDD thought I was the seer yesterday. [/ QUOTE ] Really? So which of his half-dozen or so posts gave you such a good read that you'd be willing to risk not being able to kill a confirmed wolf on a future night?
|
|
#876
04-26-2007, 12:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
As for "not seeing" lastchance threaten to kill mdorand...
He posted in all caps, and then posted a SECOND message in all caps about being a vigilante. Did you miss BOTH messages?
|
|
#877
04-26-2007, 12:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
As for "not seeing" lastchance threaten to kill mdorand... He posted in all caps, and then posted a SECOND message in all caps about being a vigilante. Did you miss BOTH messages? [/ QUOTE ] Did you even read my post about this before? I missed his first one, and left before his second one. I didn't see them until I got back to my computer after night.
|
|
#878
04-26-2007, 12:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As for "not seeing" lastchance threaten to kill mdorand... He posted in all caps, and then posted a SECOND message in all caps about being a vigilante. Did you miss BOTH messages? [/ QUOTE ] Did you even read my post about this before? I missed his first one, and left before his second one. I didn't see them until I got back to my computer after night. [/ QUOTE ] You didn't leave before his second one. You posted after his second post.
|
|
#879
04-26-2007, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] As for "not seeing" lastchance threaten to kill mdorand... He posted in all caps, and then posted a SECOND message in all caps about being a vigilante. Did you miss BOTH messages? [/ QUOTE ] Did you even read my post about this before? I missed his first one, and left before his second one. I didn't see them until I got back to my computer after night. [/ QUOTE ] You didn't leave before his second one. You posted after his second post. [/ QUOTE ] I was writing my last post while he was writing his second The post # of his second was 10108749. The post number of my last one was 10108759. I hit submit, and I left the computer. This is pretty basic if you look at the time stamps. Which you obviously won't, since it doesn't suit your argument. I was quite happy to see you lynched that night, since I knew you were lying. That just confirmed what I already knew.
|
|
#880
04-26-2007, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CHAOS at the 2007 WSOP: Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
I was quite happy to see you lynched that night, since I knew you were lying. That just confirmed what I already knew. [/ QUOTE ] Why'd you peek Jeremy night 3 then?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
