![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Billie,
Knowing Peachy a bit, I don't think she's trolling. She's just being herself and communicating how she communicates. It might annoy you a lot, but I don't think there's anything wrong with it in a TOS kinda way. I suggest liberal use of the ignore function and/or an argument that makes a 10 page thread. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I could write 10 pages at will I'd be rich by now [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
liberal use of the ignore function [/ QUOTE ] YOU CANT STOP HER HORRIBLE POSTING. YOU CAN ONLY HOPE TO CONTAIN IT. edit: i really wish we had the ability to ban horrible posters. I mean if I made a new thread and just put the date as the subject line and body everyday I wouldnt be "breaking the TOS", but it would be pretty obvious I am bad for the site. I would say give the mods more discretion, but yeah, that hasnt worked in the past, so I am kind of stumped. But allowing peachy and eric to keep doing their thing is def making this place worse. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do have the ability to ban horrible posters.
People like Eric and Peachy. When I asked about Eric, a strong majority wanted him kept around. I imagine would be the same for Peachy. Plenty of other trolls get nuked hardcore. Amusingly, you've already lost (allbeit under iffy-but-hilarious circumstance) one forum referendum on your ability to post here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dont you dare ban the best troll of the week
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Amusingly, you've already lost (allbeit under iffy-but-hilarious circumstance) one forum referendum on your ability to post here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] right. and my point was "if some mod who is a complete retard who owes half the site money and runs while still keeping the support of the admins(awesome that admins on a poker message board support cheating liars btw) and decides to ban posters for no reason other than he is a [censored] piece of [censored] and the admins wont do anything about it why cant you ban people who are actually bad posters?". The fact that the mods still allow it to stand out of respect to jeremy or whatever is much more of an implication of their idiocy than mine, so yeah, I am fine with being banned from OOT because your policies are insanely moronic, just dont turn it into being something about me. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
huh, story behind welshing mods.
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
see any post by [censored]
edit: who you must respect because the admins say so even though he stole your money. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm still against banning people for sucking because sometimes they start to not suck.
But Peachy's comments were wayyyyyy out of line. I've been banned for so much less a few times. I don't see how she shouldn't be gone for a few days. Edd, you, ma'am, are the best troll this and every week [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Billie, Knowing Peachy a bit, I don't think she's trolling. She's just being herself and communicating how she communicates. It might annoy you a lot, but I don't think there's anything wrong with it in a TOS kinda way. I suggest liberal use of the ignore function and/or an argument that makes a 10 page thread. [/ QUOTE ] Change the word Billie to Dids, and change the word Peachy to ericW and i agree 100% (stretching to prove a point obv) |
![]() |
|
|