#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
[ QUOTE ]
I like the 100 posts = centurion idea. [/ QUOTE ] Do you like gladiator movies? |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] glad everyone is taking ryan's post seriously [/ QUOTE ] Oh, I fully expected lots of these. That's fine. It will have served its purpose as long as those with usable ideas still post. I'm not hearing that people want much changed here, except possibly 'old hand'. [/ QUOTE ] I think they should all be changed. Preferably to something funny. But if not, change them to anything just to keep it interesting. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
By the way, what's so bad about "old hand"?
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
Officer
Detective Sergeant Lieutenant Captain Commander Deputy Chief Chief Maybe instead of the * system, violators could get some kind of criminal ranking like felon, etc. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
[ QUOTE ]
I like a badass system: so in ascending order Neo Ripley Leon Rambo Rocky Kurgen Carter Marv Snake Plissken Chuck Norris John Matrix Bruce "I'm Hard" Lee [/ QUOTE ] Jason Bourne would have to be the top one. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
[ QUOTE ]
If you would prefer new titles and have reasonable suggestions, please let us know in this thread. [/ QUOTE ]Ryan - I hate "Carpal\'Tunnel" as a title. And yet that very title makes me realize how foolish titles are and therefore how silly it would be for me to request a new title. Can you see the paradox? At any rate, all the titles, including "Carpal\'Tunnel," made some sense when I first started posting. Nobody had 10000, or some equally absurd number of posts (sorry Tut). And the titles for those who are just starting out still make sense. "Pooh-Bah" is overly pretentious, but at least is complimentary. However "Carpal\'Tunnel" is simply a put-down. Well... it occurs to me that some may actually like that title for themselves. (I realize it's your title too). I like "grotesquely handsome" the best as a title, although I wouldn't want it to be my own title (and anyway it is "taken"). Buzz |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
Over 10k posts should simply be Degenerate.
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
8 year old boy
A cup B cup C cup Sloppy flapjacks D cup Double D's Golden bozos Major league yabbos Big giant titties Stripper Dids |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
[ QUOTE ]
stranger ---> scammer/spammer newbie ---> conspiracy theorist journeyman ---> crackpot member ---> apprentice enthusiast ---> junior member addict ---> senior member old hand ---> elite n00b veteran ---> gimmick account haver Pooh-Bah ---> inside joke getter Carpal \'Tunnel ---> Karpinski \'Tunnel [/ QUOTE ] some of these are really good. not sure if you were being serious or not. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Titles
[ QUOTE ]
Users already control avatar and location fields. It is nice to have this field be a place for official designations, like technologic "2006 WSOP ME Final Tabler" or Matt Flynn "Co-Author of PNL." The vast majority, of course, are monikers earned in the various forums, but that's fun, and the real value there is that they were assigned, not chosen. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think given the "creativity level" of some folks on this site, allowing people to customize their titles is a bad idea. They already have the Loc: field as it is. Also, undertitles being a carrot you can dangle to reward good posters is a somewhat valuable tool to have. [/ QUOTE ] QFT. |
|
|