FT sweat: EC10 at the stars million! - Page 8

JayPez · #71 07-23-2007, 02:37 AM

ul ec10, vgg

mlagoo · #72 07-23-2007, 02:37 AM

[ QUOTE ]
BTW,

Does anyone seriously think JT was a bad call?

[/ QUOTE ]

i was talking to gobbo about it

its probably a totally fine call, prob close to neutral ev maybe marginally +ev

but it was the snapcall that really tilted me

THEOSU · #73 07-23-2007, 02:39 AM

We searched on 2838181 in 590 however; we could not find any listings to display

Soulman · #74 07-23-2007, 02:39 AM

[ QUOTE ]
BTW,

Does anyone seriously think JT was a bad call?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah?

LuckyLloyd · #75 07-23-2007, 02:39 AM

It can't be a snapcall. If you sat and worked it out in your head for 20 seconds we could maybe give him credit for working out that it was good against ATC.

But it was more - J AND 10 AND CALL

mlagoo · #76 07-23-2007, 02:41 AM

[ QUOTE ]
It can't be a snapcall. If you sat and worked it out in your head for 20 seconds we could maybe give him credit for working out that it was good against ATC.

But it was more - J AND 10 AND CALL

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah this was my assessment of the situation

Ship Ship McGipp · #77 07-23-2007, 02:41 AM

dude this tournament is all skill if you were good that would have been a win obv

Soulman · #78 07-23-2007, 02:41 AM

I didn't see the entire FT. If EC was pushing ATC the call is marginal at best, what with ICM and all. Like mlagoo said though, I doubt that villain was thinking in these terms.

mlagoo · #79 07-23-2007, 02:42 AM

also losing two allins as a flip in a row at the million FT just sucks. not to mention that on top of losing the JJ to K5 just before the FT. he ran pretty bad there in the lategame which just sucks in such a big tourney where youre not going to get that deep that often.

THAY3R · #80 07-23-2007, 02:42 AM

BB needs to be what, a bit over 40% for it to be correct?

EC10 should be shoving any 2 here, and JT is a call against alot tighter than ATC.