![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sry, I see what you are saying now and you are right.
Using 99/AQ+ as a calling range - that leaves 68 calling combinations when you hold 65s and 55 calling combinations when you hold AJs. So the net EV for AJs becomes +147 and 65s is still +107, which is a 40 chip difference rather than a 16 chip difference FWIW. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Sry, I see what you are saying now and you are right. Using 99/AQ+ as a calling range - that leaves 68 calling combinations when you hold 65s and 55 calling combinations when you hold AJs. So the net EV for AJs becomes +147 and 65s is still +107, which is a 40 chip difference rather than a 16 chip difference FWIW. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah sounds sort of like what I said, that its worth close to one SB less, which is pretty relevant when there are only 3 SBs in the pot the begin a hand (although there are 5 of them this hand because of the limper). |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
ummm lol you're significantly worse then colson and/or most sicko mtt players... [/ QUOTE ] You intended this as an insult, but it is a compliment, ducy? [ QUOTE ] what do you think your respect means in the HIGH STAKES mtt world??? [/ QUOTE ] As a sicko MTT player, clearly something. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My respect for colson just went WAYYY down. [/ QUOTE ] ummm lol you're significantly worse then colson and/or most sicko mtt players...what do you think your respect means in the HIGH STAKES mtt world??? [/ QUOTE ] yeah, wtf is this timex? [/ QUOTE ] My statements are as bold and agressive as my calls. |
![]() |
|
|