#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
yeah to fold he needs to have 22, with the other 2 2's dead, all of the 5's missing, both his flushdraws covered, and someone to have his pair covered
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
[ QUOTE ]
yeah to fold he needs to have 22, with the other 2 2's dead, all of the 5's missing, both his flushdraws covered, and someone to have his pair covered [/ QUOTE ] so, he could fold 22 at full ring? |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
no because he doesnt know if the 2s are dead etc.
He has still to calculate with 10% equity fr. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
[ QUOTE ]
yeah to fold he needs to have 22, with the other 2 2's dead, all of the 5's missing, both his flushdraws covered, and someone to have his pair covered [/ QUOTE ] even then he needs to call because of the chances of a split on the board Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 1,086,008 games 0.078 secs 13,923,179 games/sec Board: Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 01.015% 00.00% 01.02% 0 11024.00 { 2c2d } Hand 1: 01.015% 00.00% 01.02% 0 11024.00 { 2h2s } Hand 2: 48.985% 02.07% 46.92% 22460 509520.00 { 5c5d } Hand 3: 48.985% 02.07% 46.92% 22460 509520.00 { 5h5s } --- |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
guy correctly folds the losing hand and wins 10k. why all the hate?
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
^^thats wrong it has to look like this:
equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 00.086% 00.00% 00.09% 0 565.67 { 2c2d } Hand 1: 00.086% 00.00% 00.09% 0 565.67 { 2h2s } Hand 2: 20.414% 00.03% 20.38% 210 134113.67 { 5c5d } Hand 3: 23.372% 02.99% 20.38% 19676 134113.67 { 5h5s } Hand 4: 28.021% 06.42% 21.60% 42238 142143.67 { AcKc } Hand 5: 28.021% 06.42% 21.60% 42238 142143.67 { AdKd } |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yeah to fold he needs to have 22, with the other 2 2's dead, all of the 5's missing, both his flushdraws covered, and someone to have his pair covered [/ QUOTE ] even then he needs to call because of the chances of a split on the board Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 1,086,008 games 0.078 secs 13,923,179 games/sec Board: Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 01.015% 00.00% 01.02% 0 11024.00 { 2c2d } Hand 1: 01.015% 00.00% 01.02% 0 11024.00 { 2h2s } Hand 2: 48.985% 02.07% 46.92% 22460 509520.00 { 5c5d } Hand 3: 48.985% 02.07% 46.92% 22460 509520.00 { 5h5s } --- [/ QUOTE ] whoops forgot about split pots |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
Stop nitting up this tread with your fancy maths, poker is won with heart, courage, and excellent laydowns when you know you're beat.
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
[ QUOTE ]
^^thats wrong it has to look like this: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 00.086% 00.00% 00.09% 0 565.67 { 2c2d } Hand 1: 00.086% 00.00% 00.09% 0 565.67 { 2h2s } Hand 2: 20.414% 00.03% 20.38% 210 134113.67 { 5c5d } Hand 3: 23.372% 02.99% 20.38% 19676 134113.67 { 5h5s } Hand 4: 28.021% 06.42% 21.60% 42238 142143.67 { AcKc } Hand 5: 28.021% 06.42% 21.60% 42238 142143.67 { AdKd } [/ QUOTE ] .086% * 90k = $77.40 still an instacall [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: stars 10 billionth hand
ups i made a mistake craigthedeac calculations were right i forgot that the flushdraws are already covered by the 55s
|
|
|