|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If you stopped doing SSSH reviews or are considering stopping it would be because: | |||
| I'm at the top of my game now, thanks to the reviews! |
   
|
2 | 5.56% |
| I've had leaks detected and now I need to work on them...but I may come back later. |
  
|
5 | 13.89% |
| My reviewers aren't finding any/many new/unknown leaks. |
  
|
9 | 25.00% |
| I struggle to find the time to do reviews. |
  
|
11 | 30.56% |
| I've had one or more poor reviews so it seems like a waste of time |
  
|
7 | 19.44% |
| I'm doing full ring reviews over in the Micro forum instead. |
  
|
1 | 2.78% |
| Other (please reply in this thread or PM Happydaz.) |
|
1 | 2.78% |
| Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
02-20-2007, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Daniel is better than average at all types of poker. And he's probably better at mixed games than most. That being said, I doubt he could beat 25/50 NLHE online. Anything 50/100+ and above, he is a huge dog in NLHE online. (Live is a different story, since a ton of fish play NLHE live). [/ QUOTE ] I would bet you are wrong. I am very confident that I could beat $25-$50 NLH games online, and also games as big as $100-$200. Ok, so I think I'd win, you think I'd lose, who's right? [/ QUOTE ] why dont you guys enter a prop bet for 100k to settle the score! 
|
|
#72
02-20-2007, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
I can't believe you are on here answering to this [censored]. You have won close to $10 million playing poker. You have beaten tough fields. You have beaten weak fields. You have called your shot to win player of the year. You have beaten the biggest game, albeit playing sparingly. You have won so much money that you have willingly donated playing HU high stakes LHE on your own site for publicity. I don't get it.
|
|
#73
02-20-2007, 10:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Daniel is better than average at all types of poker. And he's probably better at mixed games than most. That being said, I doubt he could beat 25/50 NLHE online. Anything 50/100+ and above, he is a huge dog in NLHE online. (Live is a different story, since a ton of fish play NLHE live). [/ QUOTE ] I would bet you are wrong. I am very confident that I could beat $25-$50 NLH games online, and also games as big as $100-$200. Ok, so I think I'd win, you think I'd lose, who's right? [/ QUOTE ] Only way to know for sure is for you to play for a meaningfull period of time. I'm sure you'd have a following if you did and posted results. Not sure if it would be worth it to you - obviously you have been a successful poker player, but if beating the online specialists at their game represents a challenge to you I'm sure the peanut gallery on both sides would love to watch.
|
|
#74
02-20-2007, 11:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Daniel is better than average at all types of poker. And he's probably better at mixed games than most. That being said, I doubt he could beat 25/50 NLHE online. Anything 50/100+ and above, he is a huge dog in NLHE online. (Live is a different story, since a ton of fish play NLHE live). [/ QUOTE ] I would bet you are wrong. I am very confident that I could beat $25-$50 NLH games online, and also games as big as $100-$200. Ok, so I think I'd win, you think I'd lose, who's right? [/ QUOTE ] Only way to know for sure is for you to play for a meaningfull period of time. I'm sure you'd have a following if you did and posted results. Not sure if it would be worth it to you - obviously you have been a successful poker player, but if beating the online specialists at their game represents a challenge to you I'm sure the peanut gallery on both sides would love to watch. [/ QUOTE ] Since the law forced FCP to switch networks FCP doesn't really have a $25-$50 NLH game anymore. They get $10-$20 NLH, but not $25-$50.
|
|
#75
02-20-2007, 11:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Daniel is better than average at all types of poker. And he's probably better at mixed games than most. That being said, I doubt he could beat 25/50 NLHE online. Anything 50/100+ and above, he is a huge dog in NLHE online. (Live is a different story, since a ton of fish play NLHE live). [/ QUOTE ] I would bet you are wrong. I am very confident that I could beat $25-$50 NLH games online, and also games as big as $100-$200. Ok, so I think I'd win, you think I'd lose, who's right? [/ QUOTE ] It's easy to prove whether you are right or wrong. Go play 100/200 NLHE or higher online for a good period of time, have someone datamine the results, and we'd know. It would also help if you played more than one table at once...
|
|
#76
02-20-2007, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
Wow, a thread started by OP, who cannot beat 100NL, trashing a 10M+ lifetime winner's poker skills, followed by a reply with generalizations about religions that OP obviously does not understand. Congrats, you got DN to respond, so I guess it wasn't a complete failure.
|
|
#78
02-20-2007, 11:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Daniel is better than average at all types of poker. And he's probably better at mixed games than most. That being said, I doubt he could beat 25/50 NLHE online. Anything 50/100+ and above, he is a huge dog in NLHE online. (Live is a different story, since a ton of fish play NLHE live). [/ QUOTE ] I would bet you are wrong. I am very confident that I could beat $25-$50 NLH games online, and also games as big as $100-$200. Ok, so I think I'd win, you think I'd lose, who's right? [/ QUOTE ] Only way to know for sure is for you to play for a meaningfull period of time. I'm sure you'd have a following if you did and posted results. Not sure if it would be worth it to you - obviously you have been a successful poker player, but if beating the online specialists at their game represents a challenge to you I'm sure the peanut gallery on both sides would love to watch. [/ QUOTE ] Since the law forced FCP to switch networks FCP doesn't really have a $25-$50 NLH game anymore. They get $10-$20 NLH, but not $25-$50. [/ QUOTE ] I do wish you would join the games at FTP. I know that its not your site and all but it'd be nice to see you get in there and mix it up.
|
|
#79
02-21-2007, 02:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
Simple truth is that winning or losing mostly changes the perception of people. This board is no different and even thinkers of the game often fall prey for it. I always see the 'current' big time online winner hailed as a demi-god on these board, while the big winner from a few months ago is mostly forgotten and sometimes bad-mouthed.
The simple truth is that in a tough game there is many marginal situations, and in marginal situations there is often a very thin line between looking like a genius and looking like a moron.
|
|
#80
02-21-2007, 03:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel N. lacks pure poker skills?
Get on Full Tilt and play these games Daniel... I'm not saying you have prove yourself to anyone, anyone with your poker resume is respected, but do it for the fans.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
