![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think I'm going to wait for another week on this one. I don't want to push my luck with the Steelers. [/ QUOTE ] This is a bizarre comment. [/ QUOTE ] Well I don't gamble on sports much (see my Seattle and Washington picks last weekend to give Mansion a little thank you). My gut tells me that Pitt is in a little trouble at the moment. But then there's part of me that says go with FWP. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The T&C for RAF says: "Friend/ Referred Customer must rollover deposit amount 1x rollover with no losses necessary to considered a qualified Friend." What does "with no losses necessary" mean?
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i'm guessing it means you don't have to lose the bet for it to count.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think I'm going to wait for another week on this one. I don't want to push my luck with the Steelers. [/ QUOTE ] This is a bizarre comment. [/ QUOTE ] Well I don't gamble on sports much (see my Seattle and Washington picks last weekend to give Mansion a little thank you). My gut tells me that Pitt is in a little trouble at the moment. But then there's part of me that says go with FWP. [/ QUOTE ] But you're not gambling on Pittsburgh...it's a risk-free bet! |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
But you're not gambling on Pittsburgh...it's a risk-free bet! [/ QUOTE ] I completely hear what you're saying. The way I was looking at it was that if I can choose the game to make the risk free bet on, then why not pick one better than Pitt @ Jax? I'm slowly becoming convinced, but still haven't made up my mind. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
www.trackmybets.com is offering kickback of $25 + 5% of initial deposit amount, up to a max of $75, for BetWWTS. I'm currently trying to figure out if there is any wagering requirement on this kickback, their website doesn't list any. I emailed them asking, will post results.
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, I stupidly missed out on the whole Mansion thing. Can someone explain to me what hedging would even be in this situation? Would it be like betting $50 on the Jags so that no matter who won you'd get $50? Sounds like a pussy move to me >_>
Also would it be dumb of me to deposit $1000 for the full $200, wait 30 days to cash it out and then try to play with just the bonus money? |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am also interested in getting a referal offer for this
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
someone pm me a referral offer and sparknotes on this thread =)
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any reason NOT to combine this with the Bet Fred offer? Bet on Pittsburgh at BetWWTS and bet on Jacksonville at BetFred (the line right now is Pit -1.5 at both sites)?
For example, you can bet $200 on Pit at BetWWTS and £100 on Jax at Bet Fred. Since £1 = almost $2: <ul type="square">[*]If Pit wins/covers you win $200 (less the vig.) at BetWWTS and lose £100 at BetFred for a wash. [*]If Jax wins you get $100 back from BetWWTS leaving you -$100; and you win your £100 bet + £100 bonus from BetFred for a net of a little less than $300.[/list]Thanks to the vig., I think you lose the least EV by betting only $100 at BetWWTS; but you can lock in a profit by betting anywhere from around $200-$500 on Pit at BetWWTS. The Mansion thing was my first sports bet. Am I missing anything obvious? |
![]() |
|
|