|
|
#71
08-20-2006, 06:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Prahlad on FTP- It\'s getting bad
"Guys, while its sort of hard to believe, most of the big name pros multitable $3/6 and similar stakes because they can play alot of tables"
|
|
#72
08-20-2006, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Prahlad on FTP- It\'s getting bad
[ QUOTE ]
I had the pleasuer of listening to Barry Greenstein speak recently, and he said something that proves how confident the top pros are in their game. I am paraphrasing now, but basically he said...there are some good internet players out there...but they DO NOT stand a chance in their game. They are so confident in their abilities, they will cater a game to meet the needs of someone wanting to take a shot, because it doesn't matter what game they play, they know they still have an advantage. It makes sense. These guys like Prahlad *while he is an excellent player* they just do not have 25+ years experience in the various games guys like Doyle, Chip and Barry have had. [/ QUOTE ] There is someone who can shed some light into this question (in time). I_Knockout_U who is one of the best online has been taking shots into the big game. Just watch how that turns out. (too early to tell yet, only hearing some random things like, "lost 600K today, won 500K yesterday")
|
|
#76
08-21-2006, 06:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Prahlad on FTP- It\'s getting bad
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder what his roll is. I would do him good to grind it out the next few months. [/ QUOTE ] He was saying that he was done with NL on Friday, loses all of that money on steam on Saturday into Sunday morning, and played NLH all day on Sunday.
|
|
#77
08-21-2006, 07:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Prahlad on FTP- It\'s getting bad
after watching high stakes poker on gsn ive come to the conclusion that the high stakes players are cenile. theres no way they are all the best players in every variant of poker as your bg quote suggests. its also a lie because they wont play HU LE with eric sagstrom and even neverwin cant get a hu game.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
