Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 07-20-2007, 05:17 PM
elwoodblues elwoodblues is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweet Home, Chicago
Posts: 4,485
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
There is no such thing as 'illegal firearms' in the United States, no matter what the police tell you. The constitution is still the highest law of the land.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very helpful to the discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 07-20-2007, 05:27 PM
mjkidd mjkidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Supporting Ron Paul!
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"The fact that they killed themselves also shows the "slaughtered" statement to be misleading. "

How convienant. One group rolls in with weapons and tanks and hand grenades, and the other group just kills themselves. Sounds plausible to me!

[/ QUOTE ]


I am so [censored] amazed that anyone could possibly believe that; or that they have the nerve to spin it that way.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm amazed how you would know any differently. Lighting the place on fire makes no sense for the government to do it. But whatever fits your agenda. The government must used the same crew to put explosives in it as they did in the World Trade Center.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that burning the place down made no sense for the feds. I also think that pumping tear gas into the compound for SIX STRAIGHT HOURS into areas that contained babies and small children makes no sense either, but this is what the FBI did.

In any case, the tear gas and the methelyne chloride that it was dissolved in are both inflammable, so at the very least, the FBI was pumping in inflammible substance into the compound. Whether or not they lit the match, I cannot say.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 07-20-2007, 05:28 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
Lighting the place on fire makes no sense for the government to do it.

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure the gas they were pumping in was flammable.
in any case, it makes no sense to shoot up a house full of children in order to save the children, in the first place, so I don't think it's useful to assume the fbi/atf were acting rationally. In fact I think a strong case could be made that they were in assault mode and viewed everyone in that house as 'enemy combatants' that needed to be killed or subdued in any way possible.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 07-20-2007, 05:32 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lighting the place on fire makes no sense for the government to do it.

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure the gas they were pumping in was flammable.
in any case, it makes no sense to shoot up a house full of children in order to save the children, in the first place, so I don't think it's useful to assume the fbi/atf were acting rationally. In fact I think a strong case could be made that they were in assault mode and viewed everyone in that house as 'enemy combatants' that needed to be killed or subdued in any way possible.

[/ QUOTE ]


Exactly. The ATF and FBI are a bunch of insane killers. Calling them a cult would be too mild.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 07-20-2007, 05:45 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
Exactly. The ATF and FBI are a bunch of insane killers. Calling them a cult would be too mild.

[/ QUOTE ]

well the haruchi sniper guy did kill vicki weaver when she was unarmed and holding a baby, and got promoted for it, so it's hard to argue with you.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 07-20-2007, 05:48 PM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lighting the place on fire makes no sense for the government to do it.

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure the gas they were pumping in was flammable.
in any case, it makes no sense to shoot up a house full of children in order to save the children, in the first place, so I don't think it's useful to assume the fbi/atf were acting rationally. In fact I think a strong case could be made that they were in assault mode and viewed everyone in that house as 'enemy combatants' that needed to be killed or subdued in any way possible.

[/ QUOTE ]


Exactly. The ATF and FBI are a bunch of insane killers. Calling them a cult would be too mild.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok so get this. After I graduated from school, I wanted to work for the FBI. So I applied and luckily enough I got invited in for an interview/examination. Well I passed with flying colors (was there ever any doubt) and they came in, shook my hand and said "Nice work, now it's time for the real test". I was like "Uhh cool, am I in or what" and they said "Almost."

So they take me into this back room and there's an ATF agent there, and I'm like "Uhhh I thought this was the FBI, not the ATF, what gives" and they told me that they're just puppets of the same entity. I was like "ok whatever, so what's this test" and they handed me a loaded Walther P99 (I thought the FBI prefered Glocks as the standard sidearm, but whatever). Then they wheel out this carriage, and I lean in to look inside and there is a baby in there, couldn't have been more then 6-7 months old. So I was like "Ok am I babysitting now" and they're like "Not exactly".
Then one of them says "Last test, you have to kill the baby". So of course I was like "Umm I'm not gonna shoot the baby, for starters that's wrong, and even if it weren't, there's cameras all over and like 10 people in here" and they said "Don't worry, we can cover anything up, we're the government" he made sure to say "the government" with that really spooky voice too.'
So I was like well if I'm this close, what's one baby, so I shot it, I mean hell he was probably going to grow up to be evil anyway right, and plus for a solid 50-60k a year I can totally betray any morals I thought I had. Then they guys were like "Wow, you killed the baby, you're gonna fit in well here...Agent Tanner". I was really excited.

I really shouldn't be telling you guys any of this, cause it's Nat'l security or whatever, but I figured a guy as sharp as Niels would be likely to figure it out anyway, and I wanted to tell you on my terms. Please don't think less of me.

Cody
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 07-20-2007, 06:12 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lighting the place on fire makes no sense for the government to do it.

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure the gas they were pumping in was flammable.
in any case, it makes no sense to shoot up a house full of children in order to save the children, in the first place, so I don't think it's useful to assume the fbi/atf were acting rationally. In fact I think a strong case could be made that they were in assault mode and viewed everyone in that house as 'enemy combatants' that needed to be killed or subdued in any way possible.

[/ QUOTE ]


Exactly. The ATF and FBI are a bunch of insane killers. Calling them a cult would be too mild.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok so get this. After I graduated from school, I wanted to work for the FBI. So I applied and luckily enough I got invited in for an interview/examination. Well I passed with flying colors (was there ever any doubt) and they came in, shook my hand and said "Nice work, now it's time for the real test". I was like "Uhh cool, am I in or what" and they said "Almost."

So they take me into this back room and there's an ATF agent there, and I'm like "Uhhh I thought this was the FBI, not the ATF, what gives" and they told me that they're just puppets of the same entity. I was like "ok whatever, so what's this test" and they handed me a loaded Walther P99 (I thought the FBI prefered Glocks as the standard sidearm, but whatever). Then they wheel out this carriage, and I lean in to look inside and there is a baby in there, couldn't have been more then 6-7 months old. So I was like "Ok am I babysitting now" and they're like "Not exactly".
Then one of them says "Last test, you have to kill the baby". So of course I was like "Umm I'm not gonna shoot the baby, for starters that's wrong, and even if it weren't, there's cameras all over and like 10 people in here" and they said "Don't worry, we can cover anything up, we're the government" he made sure to say "the government" with that really spooky voice too.'
So I was like well if I'm this close, what's one baby, so I shot it, I mean hell he was probably going to grow up to be evil anyway right, and plus for a solid 50-60k a year I can totally betray any morals I thought I had. Then they guys were like "Wow, you killed the baby, you're gonna fit in well here...Agent Tanner". I was really excited.

I really shouldn't be telling you guys any of this, cause it's Nat'l security or whatever, but I figured a guy as sharp as Niels would be likely to figure it out anyway, and I wanted to tell you on my terms. Please don't think less of me.

Cody

[/ QUOTE ]


http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...umber=11230015
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 07-20-2007, 06:12 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lighting the place on fire makes no sense for the government to do it.

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure the gas they were pumping in was flammable.
in any case, it makes no sense to shoot up a house full of children in order to save the children, in the first place, so I don't think it's useful to assume the fbi/atf were acting rationally. In fact I think a strong case could be made that they were in assault mode and viewed everyone in that house as 'enemy combatants' that needed to be killed or subdued in any way possible.

[/ QUOTE ]


Exactly. The ATF and FBI are a bunch of insane killers. Calling them a cult would be too mild.

[/ QUOTE ]

It must be nice to reduce thinking to such a black and white level. Everything is 0 or 1. No analog. Everyone is either an angel or the devil.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 07-20-2007, 06:39 PM
mjkidd mjkidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Supporting Ron Paul!
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lighting the place on fire makes no sense for the government to do it.

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure the gas they were pumping in was flammable.
in any case, it makes no sense to shoot up a house full of children in order to save the children, in the first place, so I don't think it's useful to assume the fbi/atf were acting rationally. In fact I think a strong case could be made that they were in assault mode and viewed everyone in that house as 'enemy combatants' that needed to be killed or subdued in any way possible.

[/ QUOTE ]


Exactly. The ATF and FBI are a bunch of insane killers. Calling them a cult would be too mild.

[/ QUOTE ]

It must be nice to reduce thinking to such a black and white level. Everything is 0 or 1. No analog. Everyone is either an angel or the devil.

[/ QUOTE ]

nice post hitler
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 07-21-2007, 12:06 AM
Metric Metric is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Default Re: I learned about waco tonight..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Metric,

Are you a voluntaryist?

[/ QUOTE ]
I suppose so. With regard to government, I guess you could call me an "asymptotic ACist," if you take my meaning.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not sure what you mean.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think an immediate end to all government right now is necessarily a good idea, but I think that over the long term, the ideal situation is that government becomes closer and closer to nonexistent -- and the sooner we get started on this track, the better.

So I guess this means that as of right now, I'd be better described as a Libertarian than an ACist -- but extrapolating into the future, ACism is where I'd like to see things eventually go.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.