Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

[lowpockets]

For those of us that didn't see the original - are we going to just be left hanging for an unknown amount of time and left to trust gild that a poker site is rigged until then?

(p.s. they should have just had one of these accounts win a bbj or two)

[Clayton]

adanthar would not be making [censored] up

the fact that theres a 65/50 limit player with a 75% W$SD is the most damning, as that is literally improbable to the tune of finding a needle in the sahara.

[DopamineRelease]

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]
Wtf? If this type of account actually exists I really think people playing these levels should be allowed to discuss it. Why move it to the mod forum?

[toss]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But I agree I think we're going to need to see more than one HH per account to make sure it isn't just some drunk guy with a load of cash. I mean, are these people playing a LOT or what's up?

[/ QUOTE ]

there is an account running at 65/50 at HS limit with a 75% W@SD. that account coldcaps preflop from the BB then check/folds the flop on a 522 board when someone flops a full house. over, and over, and over.

oh yeah and the ten high call HU on the turn of the toughest weekly tournament ever by a guy who busted within 5 minutes in the only two other low stakes donkaments he's ever played.

[/ QUOTE ]

What kind of sample size are we looking at?

[keikiwai]

[ QUOTE ]
adanthar would not be making [censored] up

the fact that theres a 65/50 limit player with a 75% W$SD is the most damning, as that is literally improbable to the tune of finding a needle in the sahara.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm pretty sure i could find at least one if not more needles in the sahara

[keikiwai]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

is this an elaborate level, or do you not understand that the cheating is on absolute, and when they make redic calls w/ T high, it's because they WIN the hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

my point is that people sometimes DO call with 10 high and a very small % of the time they are going to be right. this is why you can't look at one hh and say "omg he can see peoples cards"

but it looks like theres actually a lot more evidence so.. yeah wow.

[/ QUOTE ]

true

[mason55]

i don't understand why you're all so sure this is some "superuser" account on ABS and not people getting trojaned? how can you tell?

[goofyballer]

That tournament hand makes it more unlikely that it's due to a virus since you can't really hunt someone down you happen to have infected in a donkament.

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
i don't understand why you're all so sure this is some "superuser" account on ABS and not people getting trojaned? how can you tell?

[/ QUOTE ]

there are lots of people involved, all of whom have the same suspicions, and the superuser info came from dan druff, a well connected limit pro.

check out the river AF on this baby:

[mason55]

ok so maybe there's a flaw in the abs software and anyone can do this? much more likely than some "superuser" account(s apprently?) that fell into tthe wrong hands