![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting post, but the biggest thing I took from it is that you played a "bukkake style"... gross
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jason,
Have you read bruiser's hooker trip report in OOT? |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All --
Shaniac comes in this thread and says "yawn" at Jason's post. Shaniac's blog is awesome but the dude routinely makes basic punctuation errors. Cool parallel, no? --Nate |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Jason, Great post. I hope you write a book... ...so that I can sue your rich ass for stealing my ideas. ML4L [/ QUOTE ] I swear, the second I saw you were the last reply I thought "I wonder if mike's gonna call out strasser for ripping him off..." haha [/ QUOTE ] You know those posts say very different things, right? --Nate |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What I got from this is reinforcement that as a player I should be careful of what I learn via practice, because the "true"(long term) causality between an action/a strategy and its profitability in a situation is obfuscated by luck.
Would you agree that the implication in learning/playing poker is to be careful as I said above, and also perhaps that "book" learning of poker principles via books, discussions, message boards...can be beneficial in a way that gets right to the correct strategy since it is seemingly devoid of results blurring perception? |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ML4L,
I liked your post at any rate. Good analogy with Tommie Frazier. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Jason, Great post. I hope you write a book... ...so that I can sue your rich ass for stealing my ideas. ML4L [/ QUOTE ] Oh bitch please. Only one who sounds dumber for calling me out for stealing your ideas is Timmy Hardaway on the radio tonight. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Jason, Great post. I hope you write a book... ...so that I can sue your rich ass for stealing my ideas. ML4L [/ QUOTE ] Oh bitch please. Only one who sounds dumber for calling me out for stealing your ideas is Timmy Hardaway on the radio tonight. [/ QUOTE ] i rarely watch sportscenter and turned it on real quick before checking up on my dvr, and i turned on right when he said what he said. instant "save until manually erased" status |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Post deleted by Goldmund
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the LAG beats the TAG, and the TAG beats the LAG, who wins when a LAG plays a TAG? This is like saying: when your opponent plays loose you should tighten up, and when your opponent plays tight you should loosen up. This advice means that both the loosie and the tightie are playing "correctly" against one another. It's circular argumentation and makes no sense. What beats "LAG" is slightly less LAG play, and what beats TAG is slightly less TAG. You should open up your game when your opponent is either playing too loose OR too tight. Goldmund
[ QUOTE ] Once you start playing against a pool of regular players, the game becomes simply who can adjust to who faster, much like an average HU match. Whoever re-adjusts to their opponent first, wins. If someone is playing to tight (TAG), the LAG will run him over. If someone is playing too loose (LAG), the TAG will keep snapping him off until something breaks. Kirk [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
![]() |
|
|