Stars Regs Thread - Page 78

KeanuReaver · #**771** 10-01-2007, 07:41 PM

opinions on chemical502?

keikiwai · #**772** 10-01-2007, 07:56 PM

[ QUOTE ]
opinions on chemical502?

[/ QUOTE ]

> than chemical501 but < than chemical503

KeanuReaver · #**773** 10-01-2007, 08:07 PM

:[[[[[[[[

CanuckEh · #**774** 10-01-2007, 08:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fully awake.

[/ QUOTE ]

you got a 30k break even stretch it looks like in tehre. for alot of people thats how many hands they play in a month,

[/ QUOTE ]

Then you aren't considered a "regular" are you?

1C5 · #**775** 10-01-2007, 08:51 PM

I would consider 30K hands a month a regular.

luckybacon · #**776** 10-01-2007, 08:52 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fully awake.

[/ QUOTE ]

you got a 30k break even stretch it looks like in tehre. for alot of people thats how many hands they play in a month,

[/ QUOTE ]

Then you aren't considered a "regular" are you?

[/ QUOTE ]

of course you are.

futuredoc85 · #**777** 10-01-2007, 09:37 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I would consider 20K hands a month a regular.

[/ QUOTE ]

pat23 · #**778** 10-01-2007, 10:16 PM

anyone who has seen me play id be curious about leaks in my game

cs3 · #**779** 10-03-2007, 04:34 AM

who the [censored] is stars 100NL regular Midnight Tokr? that donk tilts me so hard lol
guy is a complete Lagtard and makes some rediculously bad calls, but heruns SIIIIIICKKKKKK hot vs me.
does this guy really win any money or is he a loser overall like in my smallish database?

Barrin6 · #**780** 10-03-2007, 04:43 AM

[ QUOTE ]
How do you regulars have horrible months? Month is a pretty long time, and if you can't beat 200nl in a month, then you must be a pretty bad regular. Anyone agree?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, but moreso if the hands are >30k

View Poll Results: No threadjacking rule
Yes	8	53.33%
No	7	46.67%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll