FGators graph thread [modnote: read the end, it's even worse]

[FGators]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just because people think I should come on here and say I suck when I'm better than most all of you doesn't make me hard-headed and when I'm playing my A game I think I'm one of the best online tournament players in the world.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that why you chose to play 1.6 million cash hands?

<font color="white"> Lori </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really as addicted to tournaments as cash games and a lot of the time I dont have a 5 hour block to play MTTs.

[clowntable]

How about ...

[JP OSU]

[ QUOTE ]
milk,

I'm at work and cannot see any pics/graphs so I have no idea what you are referring to.

[/ QUOTE ]

He is referring to the allin luck graph for those 150k hands which showed that you were running bad in allin pots to the tune of 15 buyins...

[[Phill]]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just because people think I should come on here and say I suck when I'm better than most all of you doesn't make me hard-headed and when I'm playing my A game I think I'm one of the best online tournament players in the world.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that why you chose to play 1.6 million cash hands?

<font color="white"> Lori </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

LMFAO. QFMFTEtc

Gators - the first step to improvement is realising youre not good. In the grand scheme of things the best players in 1/2 NL arent that good, you could argue the same for the best 5/10 players. There is ALWAYS someone better - and in the case of you there is an absolute [censored] tonne number of people who are better.

This is true of tourneys as much as it is cash. I havent looked you up in the tourney dbase but if your winnings are 25k as someone has claimed you arent even close to the best online tourney player when youre playing your A game.

[fnord_too]

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

Suggest:

If it does fit, you must quit!

[danzasmack]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
yeah but the nature of the stat is the opposite - it should converge over time.

also the 1.6 mil hand Ev graph should be in BBs IMO

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a common fallacy. It in fact diverges does not converge. I am surprised that the majority of the people at 2+2 here do not realize this.

"Misconception 2: If run large number of coin tosses, the number of heads and number of tails become more and more equal. This is incorrect, as the LLN only guarantees that the sample proportion of heads will converge to the true population proportion (the p parameter that we selected). In fact, the difference |Heads - Tails| diverges! "

http://wiki.stat.ucla.edu/socr/index...fLargeNumbers2

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty sure you actually agreed with me, but anyway posted in probability forum bcuz i'm not gonna derail this gem of a thread.

interested to hear answers to my questions there thanks.

[FGators]

I really don't play that many tournaments because I think they are even more rigged and luck infested than the cash games...they are clearly fixed...if you have less chips than the guy you are all in against on PStars you lose practically every time...I did a study on this and emailed PStars, they tried to prove my sample size wasn't big enough so I got mad at stopped playing a lot of tournaments.

[aislephive]

[Gildwulf]

[ QUOTE ]
I really don't play that many tournaments because I think they are even more rigged and luck infested than the cash games...they are clearly fixed...if you have less chips than the guy you are all in against on PStars you lose practically every time...I did a study on this and emailed PStars, they tried to prove my sample size wasn't big enough so I got mad at stopped playing a lot of tournaments.

[/ QUOTE ]

lmao

[[Phill]]

They are not rigged.

Youre an idiot.

The concept that the guy with the most chips always winning is truly laughable - youre also an idiot if you think you EVER came close to proving it - something im sure Stars explained more than adequately.