Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Who had more posts in this thread at the time of this post (I haven't counted)
Tokyo!! 5 41.67%
BluffBank 1 8.33%
BASTARD 6 50.00%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 10-14-2007, 05:26 PM
fatgirl_lover fatgirl_lover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 295
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

INCORRECT ANSWER SIR
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 10-14-2007, 05:31 PM
2/325Falcon 2/325Falcon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,952
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

That MoveOn ad rate is a huge LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 10-14-2007, 05:50 PM
Elevens Elevens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,645
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

[ QUOTE ]
INCORRECT ANSWER SIR

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you provide evidence to prove me wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 10-14-2007, 06:27 PM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

1 - Unfortunately for you, OP didn't omit the op/ed page from review. Since the op/ed page is such a big part of a person's perception of a paper it is tough to separate the two.

2 - Your challenge is flawed also. The way a paper presents "news" can carry no less bias than the actual article at times. For example (I did find this in 2.7 seconds on Google, btw), 3 glowing ( 2 front page ) Democratic candidate profiles in a few weeks. 1 Republican profile in the last 3 months. These things happen over and over. Then add the op/ed in the mix and their agenda is clear.

3 - Your comment on "elitist" is telling too. Not to mention wrong.

But, hey, zero for three is batting a thousand dependent upon how you look at it...

[/ QUOTE ]

Let me guess...



[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. And I'm not even sure what those states have to do with anything. Red States? Yeah. Oh, but no. Those aren't the only Red States.

The South? Not close.

Don't know what you are getting at...

[/ QUOTE ]

He's just a random bigot.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 10-14-2007, 08:29 PM
InTheDark InTheDark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 207
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hippie liberal propaganda in my opinion.

[/ QUOTE ]
yes it is, and thats why it is irresponsible and dangerous.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like Jason Blair's thoughts on the matter.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 10-14-2007, 10:39 PM
Thug Bubbles Thug Bubbles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 452
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

NYT is good, comparatively, but not nearly as good as it's reputation. Bias is unavoidable, even for Associated Press pieces. Get over it. There is no vast left/right-wing conspiracy, just people trying to pull up news and people trying to pull up cash.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:10 PM
JackWhite JackWhite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,554
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

[ QUOTE ]
Awesome, this is exactly the type of detailed analysis I was looking for, especially the part I bolded. Thanks!


[/ QUOTE ]

Please go to www.timeswatch.org for plenty of examples. Even though they provide detailed analysis of Times bias, I am willing to give huge odds that you won't believe a word they say. So it probably would be a waste of your time.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 10-15-2007, 12:13 PM
ConstantineX ConstantineX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Like PETA, ride for my animals
Posts: 658
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

Story on Heart Implants

Another perfect example of NYT bias.
This story is ostensibly about the recall of heart implants because of a defect. In the middle, in a blurb, NYT felt it was necessary to inform us that:

Vice President Dick Cheney uses a Medtronic defibrillator, but it was implanted in 2001, before the Fidelis lead was introduced. The White House declined to comment last night.

Knowing the left's attitude towards Cheney (who I have no love towards), one can only assume they want to maintain a sort of Dick Cheney deathwatch, so that we can hope he dies.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 10-15-2007, 12:18 PM
elwoodblues elwoodblues is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweet Home, Chicago
Posts: 4,485
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

[ QUOTE ]
Story on Heart Implants

Another perfect example of NYT bias.
This story is ostensibly about the recall of heart implants because of a defect. In the middle, in a blurb, NYT felt it was necessary to inform us that:

Vice President Dick Cheney uses a Medtronic defibrillator, but it was implanted in 2001, before the Fidelis lead was introduced. The White House declined to comment last night.

Knowing the left's attitude towards Cheney (who I have no love towards), one can only assume they want to maintain a sort of Dick Cheney deathwatch, so that we can hope he dies.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why do I have a feeling that if the article read:
[ QUOTE ]
Former President Bill Clinton Cheney uses a Medtronic defibrillator, but it was implanted in 2001, before the Fidelis lead was introduced.

[/ QUOTE ]

You would write:
Knowing the left's attitude towards Clinton (who I have no love towards), one can only assume they want to keep him in the spotlight for any reason.

----

In short, I don't see how it shows a liberal bias to mention that the VP uses a particular type of medical device in an article about that medical device.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 10-15-2007, 12:35 PM
Mojo56 Mojo56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Default Re: NYTimes vs. Every Other Newspaper

The NY Times is excellent for wrapping fish or starting the BBQ.

Here is an article from today. How timely.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...E5NzA5ZjlkMDI=

An older one:
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/...ng_gun_on.html
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.